IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
GANESH RAM MEENA
Kapil Dev S/o Shri Bhoop Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023 for quashing and setting aside the FIR No.129/2022 (dated 14.03.2022) registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341 & 504 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(S) & 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a compromise has arrived at between the parties and they have amicably settled their dispute, therefore the impugned FIR be quashed and set aside.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments and the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the complainant acknowledges the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties and on instructions from the complainant, states that the complainant has no objection if the impugned FIR in question alongwith all consequential proceedings against the present accused-petitioners are quashed and set aside.
5. Considered the submissions made at bar and perused the material made available on record.
6. A bare perusal of the material on record shows that the dispute between the par
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes, even for non-compoundable offences, to prevent futile litigation and secure justice.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, prioritizing justice and practicality over the formalities of compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing serves the ends of justice, distinct from compounding offences.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes amicably, emphasizing the distinction between quashing and compounding offences.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences and is guided by the ends of justice.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, even for non-compoundable offences, if it serves the ends of justice.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing the distinction from compounding offences and focusing on the ends of justice.
The court established that mutual compromise can lead to quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. if the offences are not serious and justice is served.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their dispute, and continuation would serve no useful purpose, particularly in cases with a civil flavor.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.