HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
GANESH RAM MEENA
Ajeet Singh Yadav S/o Shri Kanwar Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 B.N.S.S. for quashing of FIR No.286/2024 (dated 19.06.2024) registered at Police Station Behror, District Kotputali-Behror for the offences punishable under Section 307 IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act and all consequential criminal proceedings, qua him.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a compromise has arrived at between the parties and they have settled their dispute amicably, so the criminal proceedings pending between them be quashed and set aside.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments and prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the complainant acknowledges the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties and on instructions from the complainant, states that the complainant has no objection if the proceedings of FIR in question alongwith all consequential proceedings against the present accused-petitioner are quashed.
5. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant.
6. A perusal of the material on record shows that th
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes amicably, emphasizing the distinction between quashing and compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes, even for non-compoundable offences, to prevent futile litigation and secure justice.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, prioritizing justice and practicality over the formalities of compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing serves the ends of justice, distinct from compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences and is guided by the ends of justice.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, even for non-compoundable offences, if it serves the ends of justice.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing the distinction from compounding offences and focusing on the ends of justice.
The court established that mutual compromise can lead to quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. if the offences are not serious in nature.
The power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings based on compromise, especially in cases with a predominantly civil nature, as established in the Full Bench judgment and the Supreme Court c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.