SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1240

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA, J
S.A.S. R.K. Marble Udhyog – Appellant
Versus
Shree Pustimargiya Tritiya Peeth-Pranyas Shri Dwarkadhees Mandir – Respondent


ORDER :

REKHA BORANA, J.

1. The present four revision petitions arise out of the same cause of action and hence, were heard together and are being decided by this common order.

2. The revision petitions have been preferred against the order dated 06.07.2023 passed by the Civil Judge, Rajsamand in Civil Original Suit Nos.42/2023, 43/2023, 44/2023 & 45/2023 respectively whereby the applications under Order VII Rule 11 r.w. Section 9, CPC r.w. Section 207 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act of 1955’) as filed on behalf of defendant No.1 have been rejected and the suits in question have been held to be maintainable before a Civil Court.

3. The facts are that four suits for permanent injunction were filed by the plaintiff Shree Pustimargiya Tritiya Peeth-Pranyas, Shri Dwarkadhees Mandir, Shri Dwarkadhees Mandir, Kankroli with a prayer to restrain defendant No.1 from conducting mining operation on the respective lands in question without the consent of the plaintiff and further to restrain defendants No.2 & 3 from issuing any permission/sanction or rawanna to defendant No.1 for mining on the said lands.

4. Applications under Order VII Rule 11, CPC read with Section 207 of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top