Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
INDERJEET SINGH, PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR, JJ
Vikash Sharma Son Of Shri Arvind Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur – Respondent
Order :
Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the issue involved in these writ petitions with regard to fault in the computer during typing test has already been considered and decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.12895/2024 (Ajay Meena and Ors. Vs. The Rajasthan High Court Jodhpur and Anr.) wherein on 01.10.2024 following orders was passed:-
“1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:
“(i)Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof the respondent be consider the petitioners for appear in type writing test on computer who shall be scheduled very soon.
(ii)Issue a writ order or direction to the respondent for consider the representation given of the petitioner and to be included in typewriting test on computer as per corrigendum dated 02.06.2024.
(iii) Issue a writ order or direction to the respondent after included in type writing test on computer as per corrigendum dated 02.06.2024 and after passing of said test petitioners be appointed for the post of System Assistant.
(iv) Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper, be passed in the
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot later challenge it based on alleged faults if they did not raise objections during the process.
Candidates who participate in a selection process without raising objections are estopped from later challenging its fairness.
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot later challenge its fairness or legality.
Candidates must report grievances during exams; failure to do so may bar post-exam relief, establishing that immediate protests are necessary for claims of technical errors.
The marks obtained at various stages of the selection process are not reflective of the final merit of a candidate, but considered for further participation in the next round.
The court upheld that technical issues during an examination, addressed by the respondent, do not warrant a retake if the candidate fails to meet the cut-off marks.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
