Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
J.J.Munir
Ashish Vashisht – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common facts of multiple writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's experience during typing tests. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. technical issues experienced by petitioners. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. claims of system failure leading to prejudicial outcomes. (Para 22 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. court's examination of cctv footage. (Para 44 , 55 , 58) |
| 6. determination of remedies based on systemic failure. (Para 60 , 62 , 63 , 69) |
| 7. final dismissal of all petitions. (Para 70 , 71) |
JUDGMENT :
J.J. Munir, J.
1. This judgment will dispose of Writ-A No.10952 of 2024, along with connected Writ-A Nos. 11207 of 2024, 11692 of 2024, 15347 of 2024 and 15367 of 2024, which involve common questions of fact and law, except some individual features on facts, which will be noticed in the course of this judgment.
2. Writ-A No.10952 of 2024 has been heard as the leading case and the facts common to all matters are noticed from the said writ petition. Of course, the individual features of each case will be briefly noticed.
3. The Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission issued an advertisement dated 19.09.2023, bearing No. A-5/E-1/2023, which shall hereinafter be referred to as 'the advertisement', invi
Candidates must report grievances during exams; failure to do so may bar post-exam relief, establishing that immediate protests are necessary for claims of technical errors.
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot later challenge it based on alleged faults if they did not raise objections during the process.
Judicial review cannot extend to the re-evaluation of examination results; courts must respect the evaluators' judgments when properly conducted without clear procedural violations.
Courts should refrain from re-evaluating answer sheets or typewriting sheets and should presume the correctness of the criteria applied by the examining authority. The absence of any rule or procedur....
Minor technical irregularities in recruitment exams, promptly rectified without systemic fraud or inability to segregate tainted/untainted candidates, do not vitiate entire selection process.
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot later challenge its fairness or legality.
Point of Law; whether Skill Test can be directed to be re-conducted when such a procedure is not contemplated in the Recruitment Rules - In the absence of a Rule, surely no direction for conducting t....
Candidates who participate in a selection process without raising objections are estopped from later challenging its fairness.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
