Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANAND SHARMA
Vinod Kumar, S/o. Pyarelal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through its Principal Secretary, Department of Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANAND SHARMA, J.
1. Since both the above writ petitions involve similar facts, grievance, cause of action and identical questions of law, they were heard analogously and are being decided by this common judgment. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the respective parties as also for the sake of convenience, the facts pleaded in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3098/2026 are being taken into consideration for adjudication of the controversy involved in the present matters.
2. The petitioner in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3098/2026 has prayed for following relief:
“In these circumstances, it is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to accept this writ petition and:-
i) the impugned result dated 16.01.2026 alongwith impugned merit-wise list of candidates and impugned amended result dated 06.02.2026 not selecting humble petitioner on the post of Class-IV Employee in pursuance to advertisement dated 12.12.2024 for securing negative marks may kindly be declared erroneous, illegal and arbitrary and therefore, same may kindly be quashed and set aside;
ii) The respondents may kindly be directed by issuing appropriate, writ, order or direction in the natur
Public Service Commission - Civil service Examination - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms
The court upheld the validity of minimum qualifying marks for recruitment as a discretionary power of the Commission, emphasizing administrative fairness and the principle that participation in the p....
The normalization is done based on the fundamental assumption that "in all multi-shift examinations, the distribution of abilities of candidates is the same across all the shifts
Point of law : appellants/petitioners cannot take advantage of the defective drafting of the Rule, as the position in the year 2016, is not the same as existing now. The earlier procedure followed by....
Qualifying marks in recruitment are class-specific, allowing candidates to progress in selection regardless of their category, as per Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Participating without objection in the selection process bars a candidate from later contesting its fairness; procedural adherence in evaluation is crucial for validity.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
