SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 387

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANAND SHARMA
Vishnu Datt Saini S/o Govind Narayan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry And Dairy Department – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Akshit Gupta Advocate with Ms. Aditi Vats Advocate, Mr. Shreyansh Dhariwal Advocate, Ms. Pragya Seth Advocate, Mr. Nakul Bansal Advocate and Mr. Kamlesh Sharma Advocate Mr. Harender Neel Advocate Mr. Tanveer Ahamad Advocate through VC with Mr. Illyas Khan Advocate and Mr. Umer Alam Advocate Ms. Sushila Kalwania Advocate for Mr. Pradeep Kalwania Advocate Mr. Aamir Khan Advocate for Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate General assisted by Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma Advocate, Ms. Harshita Thakral Advocate, Ms. Dhriti Laddha Advocate and Mr. Tanay Goyal Advocate Mr. Yuvraj Samant Advocate with Ms. Neha Amola Advocate and Mr. Tilak Vaid Advocate Ms. Neha Swami Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Saxena Advocate Mr. Hardik Singh Advocate with Ms. Mahi Choudhary Advocate for Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Additional Advocate General.

JUDGMENT :

ANAND SHARMA, J.

1. The present batch of writ petitions has been filed by the petitioners, primarily laying a challenge to the screening result dated 26.11.2020 declared by the respondent-Rajasthan Public Service Commission ( for short 'RPSC') for the post of Veterinary Officer. In some of the writ petitions, a challenge has been made to the result for recruitment on the post of Assistant Agriculture Officer, wherein also, the scheme of examination and governing rules are pari materia.

2. The grievance of the petitioners, who belong to Other Backward Classes (OBC) category, in the present batch of petitions emanates from a common cause of action, alleging infringement of their fundamental rights in the matter of public employment. For the purpose of understanding the question under consideration as also the dispute involved and for the sake of convenience, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, although all the above writ petitions were heard analogously, the facts stated in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14328/2020 (Vishnu Datt Saini & Others vs. The State of Rajasthan & Others) are being taken into consideration for deciding this batch of writ petitions by thi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top