ANOOP CHITKARA
Rajeev Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
1. “It cannot be, there is no power in Venice
Can alter a decree established.
’Twill be recorded for a precedent,
And many an error by the same example
Will rush into the state. It cannot be.”
- Shakespeare, (Portia, in The Merchant of Venice).
2. Given the difference of opinion amongst two Hon’ble Judges of this Court, while deciding the Letters Patent Appeals, Hon’ble the Chief Justice referred both the Intra Court Appeals to this Court as a third Judge and since both the appeals challenge the common judgments, hence are being taken up together.
3. The appellants/petitioners, who were appointed in the cadre of District Judges/Additional District Judges, by limited competitive examination and by promotion respectively, had come up before this Court seeking seniority following the post-based roster, from the date of their appointments, by pushing down the direct recruits below them, because at the time of the appointments of direct recruits, which was prior in time, no posts existed in their category, and thus the appellants were deemed to have been appoi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.