Back
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, RAKESH KAINTHLA
Surinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.10.2018, vide which the appellant (accused before the learned Trial Court) was convicted for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 302 , 201 and 309 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC) and he was sentenced as under:-
Sr.No. | Sections under which the conviction was recorded | Sentence imposed |
1. | Section 302 of IPC | Life imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default of payment of the fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for two years. |
2. | Section 201 of IPC | Rigorous imprisonment for three years and pay a fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of the fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months |
3. | Section 309 of IPC | Simple imprisonment for one year and pay a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of payment of the fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for one month. |
(Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the police presented a challan against the accused before the learned Trial Court for the commission of offen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
