Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
Tara Chand – Appellant
Versus
M.C. Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for regularization and pay scale. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. response and denial of employment as meter reader. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. details corroborating employment status and claims. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. judicial reasoning regarding claims and evidence. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. dismissal of petitions and future rights preserved. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that CWP No.6609 of 2020, titled as Deep Ram vs. Municipal Corporation Shimla and another and other connected cases may be taken up together as the prayers made in Lead Case and connected cases is identical. Prayer appears to be genuine is granted and accordingly all the cases are taken up together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
FACTUAL MATRIX IN LEAD CASE - CWPOA NO. 6609 OF 2021:
2. Petitioner, Deep Ram, has come up before this Court, seeking the following reliefs:
“7(a) That the respondent-corporation may kindly be directed to grant the pay scale of MeterReader/clerk to the applicant w.e.f. due date i.e. 05.04.2014 (Annexure A-2), on the analogy of equal pay for equal work with all consequential benefits, in the interest of justice.
7(b) That the applic
Claims for classification and regularization of employees must be supported by proof of duties performed; lack of evidence can lead to dismissal of such claims.
Employment claims must be substantiated with evidence; unproven assertions cannot alter established job designations.
Regularization of daily wagers denied post-1994 cutoff, no ongoing service, absent sanctioned vacancy; long service no equity right.
Policy for regularization must honor prior engagements if criteria are met, despite subsequent changes in policy restricting claims.
Regularization for promotion posts requires prior service in the lower cadre, and claims of discrimination must be substantiated by participation in relevant judicial proceedings.
The main legal point established is that the petitioner's services should have been regularized from 1.1.1999 as per the regularization policy, and the plea of delay and laches was rejected due to th....
The court established that employees cannot claim regularization unless they are working against sanctioned posts, as per the Jharkhand Regularization Rules of 2015 and 2019.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
