SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(HP) 414

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, CJ. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
 
M/S OASYS Cybernatics Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & another - Respondent
CWP No. 4081 of 2023
Decided on : 30-05-2024
 

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Sushant Keprate, Addl. Advocate General and Ms. Priyanka Chauhan & Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Dy.AGs.

The cancellation of a Letter of Intent without notice or justification violates principles of natural justice; a fair inquiry is imperative before withdrawing awarded contracts.

Headnote:(A) Contract Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Cancellation of Letter of Intent - The Court held that the cancellation of the Letter of Intent after allowing the petitioner to act upon it for eight months was arbitrary and unjustified without providing reasons or an opportunity for the petitioner to respond. (Paras 4(iv), 4(v), 5)

(B) Grounds for Cancellation - The reasons cited for cancellation were inconsistent and lacked factual basis, primarily focusing on a complaint from an unsuccessful bidder without any inquiry. (Paras 4(v), 4(v)(a), 4(v)(b))

(C) Fairness in Tender Process - The State is obligated to act reasonably and fairly in awarding contracts; constituted actions that deviate from established norms are subject to judicial review. [Re: Air India Ltd. Vs. Cochin International Airport Ltd. & others (2000) 2 SCC 617] (Paras 4(iii))

Facts of the case:
The petitioner contested the arbitrariness of the cancellation of a Letter of Intent issued for the supply of ePoS devices after compliance with tender requirements. Complaints regarding the petitioner’s past blacklisting surfaced, leading to the cancellation without prior warning.

Findings of Court:
The cancellation was arbitrary, lacking just reasons and in violation of natural justice principles, the petitioner had acted in accordance with the Letter of Intent's requirements.

Issues: The core issues included the legality of the cancellation of the Letter of Intent, the adequacy of the reasons provided by the State, and compliance with natural justice principles.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined the necessity for fairness in tender processes, emphasizing that the cancellation of the Letter of Intent was unjustified, as it did not provide the petitioner an opportunity to address concerns nor demonstrated a substantial reason for the cancellation.

Result: Writ Petition succeeded; the cancellation of the Letter of Intent was quashed, directing respondents to proceed under the same.

Table of Content
1. cancellation of the letter of intent (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's arguments against cancellation (Para 3)
3. relevant case laws on fair bidding (Para 4)
4. judicial conclusion on petition (Para 5)

JUDGMENT :

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.

1. Grievance in this petition is to the cancellation of Letter of Intent eight months after the same was issued to the petitioner-company.

2. Facts

2(i) In July 2021, the respondents invited an Expression of Interest from the eligible and interested agencies for complete solution of e-Point of Sale (ePoS) devices fully equipped with Iris and option of integration of weighing scale. Petitioner alongwith 17 other agencies participated in the meeting of Expression of Interest. 2(ii) For the subject matter, the respondent invited e-tenders for the first time on 20.12.2021. Four Companies, including the petitioner and one M/S Linkwell Telesystems Private Limited (Brand Name Visiontek), participated in the tender process. All the participating Companies failed to qualify the technical standards.

The tender was cancelled on 21.01.2022.

2(iii) The respondents invited 2nd e-tender on 28.01.2022. Five Companies including the petitioner and M/S Linkwell Telesystems Private Limited participated in the bidding process. This tender met the same fate as was of the first tender. It was cancelled on 22.02.2022.

2(iv) The 3rd tender was invited on 23.02.2022. Here again same five Companies which were there in the 2nd tender, participated. The petitioner Company was found to have satisfied the laid down technical specification criteria. However, being single qualified bidder, the Government advised for cancelling the tender for ‘giving equal opportunity amongst the participating bidders’. The tender was accordingly cancelled on 24.03.2022.

2(v) The tender was invited for the 4th time on 25.03.2022. This time four Companies, including the petitioner and M/S Linkwell Telesystems Private Limited participated. The petitioner again qualified the technical bid. The State Government on 24.05.2022 approved for opening petitioner’s financial bid. Petitioner’s financial bid was opened on 7.06.2022 and negotiations followed. Eventually Letter of Intent was issued in favour of the petitioner on 02.09.2022. In terms of the Letter of Intent, petitioner was selected to supply, install, maintain ePoS devices with Iris integration and developing SLA/ePoS monitoring tool, etc. to implement Aadhaar enabled Public Distribution System in the respondents-State for five years subject to fulfillment of pre-requisites and compatibility of proposed devices with the NIC software. In the Letter of Intent the petitioner was requested to ensure compliance to following in co-ordination with NIC, HP:-

“1. Testing/compatibility test, etc. of proposed devices, preferably at Hyderabad, in the office of NICSI, as discussed in the meeting held on 26.07.2022.

2. After completing all codal formality at point No. 1, the live demo of the upgraded ePOS device with the software and application of NIC will be given by your agency at the Directorate of FCS&CS, HP.

3. After the successful demonstration of the upgraded ePOS devices as per the specification mentioned in the tender document, the agreement will be signed with your agency and final award letter will be issued.

4. Also, as mentioned in the tender document, please indicate the MRP/Landing co st of the ePOS device and other major components.”

2(vi) The respondents called up on the petitioner on 19.09.2022 to start providing ‘new ePoS devices equipped with Iris scanners workable in current software on existing rates alongwith necessary training to Fair Price Shop (FPS) holders in a phased manner and to complete the task within extended period of contract so that department may switch to new system after December, 2022 with new/revised rates’. The petitioner responded vide its letter dated 20.09.2022 by stating that it has already scheduled to commence with a pilot batch of deployment of ePoS devices along

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top