Balak Ram vs State of H.P. - 2026 Supreme(HP) 82

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(HP) 82

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Balak Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Ritta Goswami, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Komal Chaudhary and Ms. Bhawna Dhiman, Advocates
For the Respondents:Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General

Table of Content
1. factual background: suit dismissed, demarcation conducted and accepted on-site. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. section 107(7) bars appeals after parties accept demarcation. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT :
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.

Petitioner feels aggrieved against the concurrent orders passed by the three Revenue Authorities below, whereby his objections to the demarcation report were dismissed.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file.

3. Facts

3(i) A civil suit was preferred by the predecessor of respondents No. 3 & 4 against one Sh. Lekh Ram, predecessor-in- interest of the present petitioner and respondents No. 9 & 10, as also other parties. The civil suit was instituted on 21.04.2009 for permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction under Sections 34, 38 & 39 of the Specific Relief Act. Subject matter of the civil suit was land measuring 0-4-8 bighas comprised in Khewat No. 18, Khatauni No.20, Khasra No. 48 situated in Muhal Padsal, Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi. Learned Civil Court dismissed the suit on 30.08.2012 holding that the plaintiff had failed to establish his ownership and possession over the suit land and that the defendant was the recorded ow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document