By way of this appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the appellant has assailed order dated 02.05.2015, passed by the learned Appellate Court in Arbitration Petition No.1 of 2010/RBT 1/2014, preferred by the present appellant under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against the award dated 01.02.2010, passed by learned Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration proceedings titled M/s Designer’s International Chandigarh versus The Block Development Officer, Nadaun. Learned Deputy Advocate General has argued that the order passed by the learned District Judge is not sustainable in the eyes of law for the reason that the learned District Judge has erred in not appreciating the statement of PW-1 in the correct perspective as a whole. He further submitted that learned District Judge erred in not appreciating that the learned Arbitrator was not having the jurisdiction to decide the case, which rendered the award to be non-est in the eyes of law. Learned Deputy Advocate General further argued that the learned District Judge erred in not appreciating that the learned Arbitrator had completely ignored the material aspe