D. DASH
IRCON International Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Amalgamated Construction India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D. Dash, J.—The Appellant-Company, by filing this Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the A&C Act’ 1996), has assailed the judgment dated 24.07.2017 passed by the learned District Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar in Arb(P) No.176 of 2012 in the matter of an application under section 34 of the Act. This Appellant had filed the application under section 34 of the A & C Act praying to set aside the award dated 13.06.2012 passed by the learned Arbitrator. By the said award, the learned Arbitrator held the Respondent No.1 (Claimant) to be entitled to a sum of Rs.11,00,000/- from the present Appellant. The learned Arbitrator having so directed the Appellant to pay the said amount to the Respondent No.1-Company (Claimant), has further directed that the same be paid with interest @ 9% per annum from October, 2000 up-till the date of award and thereafter @ 12 % till payment along with the cost of the proceeding assessed at Rs.1,18,500/-
2. Factual Matrix of the Case:-
On 02.09.1996 the Airport Authority of India Ltd. floated the tender for award of work of “Runway Extension Site” at Bhubaneswar Airport. On 04.12.1996, the Ap
(1) While exercising power under Section 34 of A & C Act, arbitral award can only be confirmed or set aside, but not modified.(2) Award passed by Arbitral Tribunal cannot be set aside on the ground t....
The court emphasized that judicial interference with arbitral awards is strictly limited, focusing only on issues of public policy or jurisdictional errors and cannot re-evaluate the merits of the aw....
(1) Appeal against modified arbitral award – Merits of award are only to be gone into, if award is demonstrated to be contrary to public policy of India.(2) Arbitral proceedings are per se not compar....
The judgment emphasizes the limited grounds for interference with arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, highlighting the need for restraint by courts while examini....
The court reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review of arbitral awards under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing that courts cannot reappraise evidence or in....
The court emphasized that judicial interference with arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is severely limited and cannot involve reevaluation of merits or factual findings.
The court affirmed that judicial intervention in arbitral awards is limited to grounds of public policy or patent illegality, emphasizing respect for the Arbitrator's findings.
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of interference with arbitral awards and the principle that courts should not interfere with arbitral awards unless there is a patent illegality or violation....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.