TASHI RABSTAN
Farhat Mir – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Tashi Rabstan, J.
Through the medium of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking to quash the Order No.113/DMB/PSA(F)/2021 dated 26.03.2021, having been passed by the District Magistrate, Baramulla, whereby the detenu, namely, Farhat Mir S/o Nazir Mir R/o Mundgi, Tehsil Dangerpora, District Baramulla, has been placed under preventive detention to prevent the detenu from smuggling timber and has been directed to be lodged in Central Jail, Kotebhulwal, Jammu.
2. It is contended in this writ petition that the detenu was arrested without any justification and cause and was detained in terms of impugned order or detention.
3. The respondents have filed the Reply Affidavit in opposition to the petition, wherein it is insisted that the detenu is involved in the timber smuggling by chopping down of the trees, encroaching the forest land, setting the forest fires and cultivating the profitable crop on the forest land.
4. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the allegations/grounds of detention are vague and mere assertions of the detaining authority and no prudent man can make an effective representation against these allegations and can
Huidrom Konungjao Singh v. State of Manipur and others
Naresh Kumra Goyal v. Union of India and others
Union of India and another v. Dimple Happy Dhakad
Sasthi Chowdhary v. State of W.B.
Haradhan Saha v. State of W.B.
State of Maharashtra v. Bhaurao Punjabrao Gawande
Union of India v. Yumnam Anand M.
The State of Bombay v. Atma Ram Shridhar Vaidya
Sunil Fulchand Shah v. Union of India and others
Bhut Nath Mete v. State of W.B.
Dharmendra Suganchand Chelawat v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.