SANJAY DHAR
Ghulam Ahmad Bhat – Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioners have sought a direction upon the respondents to pay a compensation of Rs.14.00 lacs per kanal along with solatium of 15% and interest in respect of land measuring 02 kanals and 16 marlas under Survey No.338/34-min situated at Parimpora Srinagar.
2. According to the petitioners, they were owners in possession of the land in question and the same was taken over by the Irrigation & Flood Control Department of the Government for construction of Shalteng Irrigation Canal a long time back. It has been submitted that the respondents approached the petitioners for taking over the land in question and they assured the petitioners that in lieu thereof, they will be paid compensation. However, without paying any compensation to the petitioners, the respondents forcibly took over possession of the land in question in the year 1978-79. It has been further contended that the petitioners requested the respondents either to vacate the said land or in the alternative to pay compensation to them and in this regard a number of representations were filed by the petitioners with the respondents.
3. Ultimately, on 18.04.2008, respondent No.1 issued indent certifying therein th
Indian Handicrafts Emporium and others vs. Union of India and others
Vidya Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
State of W.B. v. Subodh Gopal Bose
K.T. Plantation (P) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Darius Shapur Chenai
Delhi Airtech Services (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.