JUDGMENT :

Today, this matter has been argued by Mr. Rajeev Lochan who is practising lawyer of Delhi High Court and his Enrolment No. is D/412/2011.

2. Mr. Rishi Chandan, who is practising lawyer of this Court pointed out that his senior is Mr. Rajiv Lochan and his Enrolment No. is 3325/2000 and his Enrolment Number has been used in filing valalatnama. He further submits that spelling of the name of his senior is Rajiv Lochan whereas the spelling of this advocate is Rajeev Lochan.

3. Mr. Jagdeesh, who is practising lawyer of this Court fairly submits that Rajeev Lochan who is arguing this matter sent vakalatnama in which Enrolment No. is 3325/2000 disclosed and he has filed the vakalatnama as it is he received. The entire documents have been sent by Rajeev Lochan from Delhi.

4. Prima facie, it appears that in filing this vakalatnama interpolation has been made by counsel appearing for the petitioner namely, Rajeev Lochan.

5. Accordingly, this matter is referred to the Bar Council of India as well as Jharkhand State Bar Council who will enquire into the matter.

6. This practice is looms large in the entire country. The concern has been shown by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as well as High Co