Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Srikant Ram, son of Sujadhar Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through the Director General of Police – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant petition has been filed in terms of the order/observation made by Hon'ble Apex Court dated 11.07.2022 in S.L.P. No.9467-9472 of 2022 whereby and whereunder the Hon'ble Apex Court has been pleased to make following observations, for ready reference the same is being referred hereunder as :-
We, however, do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned orders dated 13.12.2021, passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in the present petition and/or the Interlocutory Order dated 11.08.2017 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court.
However, at this stage, Mr. Sanjay Parikh, learned counsel for the petitioners, points out that services of some of the candidates, who were found medically fit by the Appellate/ Apex Medical Board have also been dispensed with. We find that no such argument was raised before the High Court. Be that as it may, we grant liberty to such candidates to, firstly, approach the Division Bench of the High Court for recall/review of the Orders terminating their services, and if they don’t s
The main legal point established in the judgment is that medical fitness is not the sole criterion for appointment, and the overall performance in the preliminary and main examinations is equally cru....
Conflicting medical opinions from review board at same hospital (within days) and subsequent independent government hospital warrant fresh medical examination by different board for fairness to provi....
Medical examination by the Medical Board consisting of medical experts under Rule 15(g) cannot be said to be inferior to the physical standard test conducted by a team of non-experts.
Fresh independent medical exam ordered when initial and review by same hospital yield conflicting govt hospital opinion.
Candidates must exhaust all available remedies within the recruitment process before seeking judicial intervention, and the findings of Medical Boards in recruitment processes are generally upheld un....
Conflicting medical fitness opinions from government hospitals entitle merit-selected candidate to fresh independent re-examination, despite initial and review unfitness, without impugning medical bo....
Conflicting medical reports warrant fresh independent re-examination for provisionally selected candidates.
Technicalities can never mar the substantive right of the parties, if there is a specific mention and reference of the reflection of the registration of the certificate of medical practitioner, who h....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
