Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Lakhi Lal Hansda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant intra-court appeal is under Clause-10 of Letters Patent directed against the order/judgment dated 15.09.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No.3478 of 2010, whereby and whereunder, the order dated 09.03.2010 passed by the Inspector General of Police (provision), Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, has been quashed.
2. The instant appeal is barred by inordinate delay of 179 days, therefore, an application for condoning the aforesaid delay has been filed being I.A.No.6955 of 2023.
3. This Court, after taking into consideration the fact that the instant intra-court appeal has been field after inordinate delay of 179 days, deems it fit and proper, to first consider the delay condonation application before going into the legality and propriety of the impugned order on merit.
4. The ground for condonation of delay has been taken, as per the pleading made in the instant interlocutory application that the appellant came to know the order dated 15.09.2022 passed in W.P.(S) No.3478 of 2010 on 24.11.2022, thereafter, it has been forwarded to the under Secretary on 20.12.2022 for obtaining the legal opinion through legal sectio
The law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and the burden lies on the party seeking condonation of delay to demonstrate sufficient cause, which must not be based on mere procedural delays or ....
The law of limitation is fundamental and must be strictly adhered to; mere procedural delays or bureaucratic inefficiencies do not justify the condonation of inordinate delays in filing appeals.
The law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and a party seeking condonation of delay must provide a satisfactory explanation that demonstrates diligence and bona fides; otherwise, the delay wi....
The principle that the law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and that a party seeking condonation of delay must provide a satisfactory explanation that demonstrates diligence and bona fides.
The law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and the burden of proving sufficient cause for delay lies with the party seeking condonation. Procedural delays and lack of diligence are insufficie....
The principle that the law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and that a party seeking condonation of delay must provide a satisfactory and bona fide explanation for the delay, is fundamental....
The law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and the burden lies on the party seeking condonation of delay to demonstrate sufficient cause, which must not be based on negligence or lack of bona....
The law of limitation is to be strictly enforced, and parties, including the government, must provide sufficient cause for any delay in filing appeals; negligence or lack of bona fides will not justi....
The court emphasized that delay in filing appeals must be condoned only when sufficient cause is shown, with strict adherence to the law of limitation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
