Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Ladaco Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
1. The instant intra-court appeals are under Clause-10 of Letters Patent directed against the order/judgment dated 12.12.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 5804 of 2022, whereby and whereunder, the writ petition was allowed setting aside order dated 21.10.2022 passed by the MSEFC, Jharkhand in Case No. JHMSEFC-32/2021.
I.A. No. 1540 of 2024 in LPA No. 475 of 2023:
2. The instant appeal is barred by inordinate delay of 385 days, therefore, an application for condoning the aforesaid delay has been filed being I.A. No. 1540 of 2024.
3. This Court, after taking into consideration the fact that the instant intra-court appeal has been filed after inordinate delay of 385 days, deems it fit and proper, to first consider the delay condonation application before going into the legality and propriety of the impugned order on merit.
I.A. No. 4136 of 2023 in LPA No. 173 of 2023:
4. The instant appeal is barred by inordinate delay of 504 days, therefore, an application for condoning the aforesaid delay has been filed being I.A. No. 4136 of 2023.
5. This Court, after taking into consideration the fact that the instant intra-court appea
The principle that the law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and that a party seeking condonation of delay must provide a satisfactory and bona fide explanation for the delay, is fundamental....
The law of limitation is fundamental and must be strictly adhered to; mere procedural delays or bureaucratic inefficiencies do not justify the condonation of inordinate delays in filing appeals.
The principle that the law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and that a party seeking condonation of delay must provide a satisfactory explanation that demonstrates diligence and bona fides.
The law of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and the burden of proving sufficient cause for delay lies with the party seeking condonation. Procedural delays and lack of diligence are insufficie....
The court emphasized that delay in filing appeals must be condoned only when sufficient cause is shown, with strict adherence to the law of limitation.
The court ruled that an inordinate delay in filing an appeal requires a sufficient explanation, and negligence or lack of bona fides can lead to dismissal of the application for condonation.
The law of limitation is to be strictly enforced, and parties, including the government, must provide sufficient cause for any delay in filing appeals; negligence or lack of bona fides will not justi....
The court emphasized that procedural delays and lack of bona fides do not justify condoning significant delays in filing appeals, reinforcing the importance of adhering to limitation laws.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
