SANJAY PRASAD
Vikash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay Prasad, J.
The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing the Memo No. 273 dated 30.9.2015 (Annexure-6) communicated vide Memo No. 2766 dated 06.11.2015, issued by the Commandant of JAP-5, passed in Departmental Enquiry No. 26 of 2015, wherein the Commandant have ordered for forfeiture of an increment for the period of six months, which is equivalent to one Black mark.
Further Prayer has also been made for quashing the Memo No. 1407 dated 09.6.2015 (Annexure 8), passed by the Deputy Inspector General, JAP in Appeal preferred by the petitioner against order of Commandant, which was communicated vide memo no. 1508 dated 18.6.2015 through the office of the Commandant JAP-5
It is further prayed that Memo No. 397 dated 24.10.2016, issued by the Inspector General of Police (Training) in the appeal preferred by the present petitioner, which was rejected on the ground that there is no provision for further appeal before the Director General of Police-cum-Inspector General of Police (Training) Government of Jharkhand, which was communicated by the office of Commandant JAP-5 vide Memo No. 2643 dated 04/11/2016 (Annexure10).
2. Heard Mr. Moh
Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala
Shadi Lal Gupta v. State of Punjab
Hira Nath Misra v. Principal, Rajendra Medical College, Ranchi
Satyavir Singh v. Union of India
Secretary, Central Board of Excise & Customs v. K.S. Mahalingam
Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.