Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
Shyam Sundar Agarwal Son of Kali Charan Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Ruby Kumari Wife of Shyam Sundar Agrawal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appeal regarding delay. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments for and against condoning delay. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of sufficient cause definitions. (Para 3 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. legal standards for condoning delay. (Para 7 , 20) |
| 5. dismissal of appeal and application. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant appeal preferred under Section19(1) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , is directed against the judgment dated 06.02.2023 passed in Original Suit No.249 of 2021 by the learned Principal Judge Family Court, Hazaribagh, by which, the Suit filed under Section 13(1)(ia) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955, has been dismissed on contest.
I.A.No.4540 of 2024
2. The instant appeal is barred by inordinate delay of 358 days, therefore, an application for condoning the aforesaid delay has been filed being I.A.No.4540 of 2024.
3. This Court, after taking into consideration the fact that the instant appeal has been field after inordinate delay of 358 days, deems it fit and proper, to first consider the delay condonation application before going into the legality and propriety of the impugned order on merit.
4. Mr. Ranjan Kr. Singh, learned
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
