SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 1100

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
Sitaram Baidh - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi - Respondents
W.P.(S) No. 4692 of 2022
Decided On : 19-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Peeyush Krishna Choudhary,Advocate
For the Respondents: Ms. Piyushita Meha Tudu, AC to GA-V

Regional language proficiency is not mandatory for non-gazetted employees. Conversely, exemptions from departmental administrative examinations are not automatic and require formal approval from the competent authority based on an evaluation of the employee's service record and performance.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Departmental Examination - Requirement of passing regional language examination - Non-gazetted employees are not under any compulsion to pass regional language examination unless specifically provided in relevant service rules. (Paras 3, 6, 7)

(B) Service Law - Increment and financial progression - Exemption from administrative examinations - Exemption from mandatory administrative typing examinations is not automatic - Such relaxation must be granted by the competent authority upon evaluation of service records and performance. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
Employees working in local administrative units sought increments and career advancement benefits. The authorities had withheld these benefits, mandating the passing of both regional language and administrative typing examinations. The employees contended they were not required to pass the language test due to their non-gazetted status.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that there is no legal requirement for non-gazetted employees to pass the regional language examination for promotion or increment. However, regarding administrative typing examinations, the court identified that existing service guidelines do not grant automatic exemptions, requiring adherence to specific procedures regarding performance and character records before such benefits can be extended.

Issues: Whether non-gazetted employees are mandatorily required to pass a regional language test and whether exemption from mandatory departmental administrative examinations is an automatic right.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that for non-gazetted staff, regional language proficiency is not an absolute prerequisite for career progression. Furthermore, it held that departmental examination exemptions are not automatic rights but administrative concessions that the competent authority must approve based on satisfactory service performance and the absence of disciplinary issues.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions to extend benefits to those who have fulfilled the required administrative examination criteria.

Table of Content
1. factual background and departmental positions regarding examination prerequisites for governmental increments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. interpretation of exemption protocols for departmental examinations and non-requirement of tribal language proficiency for non-gazetted staff. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. grant of increments and macp benefits based on specific documented compliance with departmental examination requirements. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT :

The petitioners, who are working as Panchayat Secretaries in different blocks of Godda district, have prayed for directing the respondents to grant them due increment from the date they have passed ‘Hindi Typing Examination’ and thereafter to extend them the benefit of M.A.C.P. as per their entitlement and to pay arrears of salary accruing in their favour

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are working as Panchayat Secretaries in different blocks of Godda district as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 6 of the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to paragraph no. 7 of the writ petition and submits that all the petitioners have passed Hindi Typing Examination and, therefore, they are entitled to get due increments as well as the benefits arising therefrom and MACP, however, they have not been given the same on the ground that they have not passed Tribal Language Examination. It has further been submitted that the petitioners being non-gazetted employees are not required to pass the Tribal Language Examination and hence, they deserve to be extended the benefit of increments and MACP after passing ‘Hindi Typing Examination’.

3. A counter affidavit dated 01.12.2023 has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 to 8, sworn by the respondent no. 3 – the Sub-Divisional Officer, Godda. It has been stated in paragraph no. 12 of the said counter affidavit that as per letter no. 1794 dated 04.04.2007 issued by the Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, it is essential for non-gazetted employees to pass at least one Tribal Language Examination which the petitioners have not passed. However, the petitioners, except the petitioner no. 2 – Gaurishankar Chaudhary and the petitioner no. 5 – Garib Harizan, have already passed the Hindi Noting and Drafting Examination.

4. The writ petition was earlier taken up on 06.12.2023 and on the said date, following order was passed:

“1. The petitioners, who are working as Panchayat Secretary in different Blocks of Godda district, have prayed for directing the respondents to grant them due increment from the date they have passed ‘Hindi Noting Drafting Examination’ and thereafter to grant them the benefit of M.A.C.P. as per their entitlement and to pay arrears of salary accruing in their favour.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, in course of argument, puts reliance on letter no. 926 dated 23.03.2021 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) issued under the signature of the Joint Secretary, Department of Planning-cum-Finance, Government of Jharkhand to the District Accounts Officer, Deoghar communicating the opinion of the Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, according to which “ ” and the provisions made in circular no. 39 dated 06.07.2001 issued by the Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand will be applicable regarding ‘Hindi Noting-Drafting Examination’ and that there is no compulsion of passing examination in tribal language by the non-gazetted employees of any service/cadre after issuance of letter no. 4709 dated 13.08.2008 by the Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand unless otherwise provided.

3. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 to 8 sworn by Mr. Baidyanath Oraon- the Sub-Divisional Officer, Godda (the respondent no. 3) giving refere

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top