IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
S. Vimala, J.
S. Thiagarajan and Others – Appellants
Vs.
Chitkala Govindaswamy and Others – Respondents
C.S. Nos. 708, 1578 of 1992 & T.O.S. No. 11 of 1992 & O.P. No. 784 of 1992
Decided On : 29-09-2015
Specific Relief Act - Section 6 - Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 301 - Removal of Executors - Void and also for Partition and separate possession - Seeking relief of recovery of possession - Petition in O.P has been filed by deceased Major General three named Executors under Will and Codicil of S.T. for grant of Probate of last Will and Testament and Codicil - Since Caveats were filed objecting to grant of Probate said O.P has been converted into - Executors of last Will and Codicil of S.T. have filed a Suit in - Apart from Agricultural operations HUF commenced Oil Distributorship business under Asiatic Petroleum Company which later became Shell Oil Storage and Distribution Company - With these funds HUF was able to marry off daughters of the family and also started acquiring further Agricultural lands - Held, Court can also scrutinize the accounts suo motu for this purpose even when not specifically moved to do so - But the mere fact that Accounts have been filed in Probate Court or even fact that Accounts have been passed by Court does not absolve the Executor or Administrator from his liability for any particular sums of money which may have been misappropriated by him and he may be sued in ordinary way for such sums by a person interested in administration of estate and he may also be made criminally liable under Section 406 of Indian Penal Code with the previous sanction of Probate Court – Petitioner dismissed
S. Vimala, J.
1. With 131 Documents on the side of the Plaintiffs and 43 Documents on the side of the Defendants, 98 Documents as Court Exhibits along with evidence of P3 (PW1), P1 (PW2), D6 (DW1), Niranjan Bhatt (DW2), Major Parthasarathy (DW3) and D1 (DW4) awaited the decision of this Court, having remained alive for 22 years. The dispute is between the Legal Heirs of S.T. Venkatranga Iyer born of the year 1877 and died on 18.1.1948 and the Legal Heirs of his brother S.T. Sadasivan born of the year 1899 and died on 29.1.1992, i.e. 44 years after the death of S.T. Venkatranga Iyer.
2. The Suit in C.S. No. 708 of 1992 has been filed for a declaration that Plot Nos. 6, 7 & 8, Bragadambal Road, Nungambakkam, Madras and the House, Garage and Out-house therein, are Joint Family Properties of the Plaintiffs and that the Will of S.T. Sadasivan is void and also for Partition and separate possession of all properties of S.T. Sadasivan.
3. Petition in O.P. No. 243 of 1992 has been filed by the deceased K.R. Ramamani, Major General Chander Govindasamy and R.K.S. Shetty, the three named Executors under the Will and Codicil of S.T. Sadasivan, for grant of Probate of the last Will and Testament dated 10.12.1990 and the Codicil dated 16.12.1991 of S.T. Sadasivan. Since Caveats were filed objecting to the grant of Probate, the said O.P. has been converted into T.O.S. No. 11 of 1992. The only Defendants in T.O.S. No. 11 of 1992 are 3rd & 8th Plaintiffs in C.S. No. 708 of 1992.
4. The Executors of the last Will and Codicil of S.T. Sadasivan have filed a Suit in C.S. No. 1578 of 1992, under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, against all the Plaintiffs in C.S. No. 708 of 1992 as well as Defendants 1 to 3 in C.S. No. 708 of 1992, seeking the relief of recovery of possession.
5. A Petition in O.P. No. 784 of 1992 has been filed by S. Govindaraj (3rd Plaintiff in C.S. No. 708 of 1992), for removal of the Executors under Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, alleging acts of misfeasance and malfeasance against them.
Plaint averments in C.S. No. 708 of 1992:
6. S.T. Venkatranga Iyer (hereinafter referred to as STV) and S.T. Sadasivan (hereinafter referred to as STS) were brothers, out of whom, the former is the elder. S.T. Venkatranga Iyer had no issues and therefore, he adopted the son of his brother S.T. Sadasivan, i.e. the First Plaintiff, namely, Thiagarajan as his son. S.T. Sadasivan had two sons and two daughters, of whom, Plaintiffs 1 & 3 are the sons and 8th Plaintiff and the First Defendant are the daughters. The 4th Defendant is the husband of the First Defendant and Defendants 2 & 3 are the sons of the First Defendant. Defendants 5 & 6 are the named Executors of the Will.
6.1. STS was a reputed banker. He was the Co-Founder of Indian Overseas Bank along with Sri M. Ct. M. Chidambaram Chettiar in the year 1937 and functioned as General Manager of the Bank till 1944, after which, he became the Deputy General Manager of United Commercial Bank, which later on, became UCO Bank.
6.2. S. Thiagaraja Iyer and his son STV, constituted themselves into a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), by birth of STV in 1877. Thereafter, STS became a Coparcener, upon his birth in 1899. After the death of S. Thiagaraja Iyer in 1901, STV became the karta of the HUF. Later, 3rd Plaintiff and 1st Plaintiff became Coparceners of HUF upon their birth in 1926 & 1931 respectively. The Ancestral properties consisted of 6.41 acres of Agricultural land in Valavanur Village.
6.3. Apart from Agricultural operations, the HUF commenced Oil Distributorship business under 'Asiatic Petroleum Company' which later became 'Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distribution Company'. With these funds, the HUF was able to marry off the 5 daughters of the family and also started acquiring further Agricultural lands in the name of STV, in Valavanur, Koliyanoor and Salampalayam Villag
Afsar Shaikh and another v. Soleman Bibi and others
Annasaheb Bapusaheb Patil and others v. Balwant alias Balasaheb Babusaheb Patil
Appasaheb Peerappa Chamdgade v. Devendra Peerappa Chamdgade and others
Associated Hotels of India Ltd. v. S.B. Sardar Ranjit Singh
Basheshar Nath v. Commissioner of Income-tax
B. Subadhra Ammal Thankachi (deceased) and others v. Thankkappan Thampi
Beni Chand (Since Dead) now by L.Rs. Appellants v. Smt. Kamla Kunwar and others
Bhau Ram v. Baij Nath Singh and others
Bhagwant P. Sulakhe v. Digambar Gopal Sulakhe and others
Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Ltd. and others
Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Kanpur and others v. Chander Sen and others
Dawsons Bank Ltd. v. Nippon Menkwa Kabushihi Kaish
Dhanalakshmi and five others v. K. Loganathan and another
D.S. Lakshmaiah and another v. L. Balasubramanyam and another
Gnambal Ammal v. T. Raju Ayyar and others
G. Narayana Raju (dead) by his Legal Representative v. G. Chamaraju and others
H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thimmajamma and others
Ishwar Dass Jain (dead) thr. LRs. v. Sohan Lal (dead) by LRs.
Jaswant Kaur v. Smt. Amrit Kaur and others
J. Naval Kishore v. D. Swarna Bhadran
Jeyaraj and others v. Gangammal and others
Krishna Bahadur v. Purna Theatre & Ors. AIR 2004 SC 4282
K.R. Sathyanarayana Rao and another v. K.R. Venkoba Rao and others
K.V. Narayanan v. K.V. Ranganadhan & Ors. 1977 (1) SCC 244
K.V. Ramasamy and another v. K.V. Rahgavan and others
Karnataka Wakf Board v. State of Karnataka and Sadasiva Gounder v. Purushothaman
Karpagam and another v. E. Purushothaman and others
Kokila v. Swathanthira and others
Kunja Behari Rena and others v. Gourhari Rana and others
Lakkireddi Chinna Venkata Reddy v. Lakkireddi Lakshamama
L.N. Aswathama and another v. P. Prakash
Municipal Board, Etawah v. MT. Ram Sri
Mademsetty Satyanarayana v. G. Yelloji Rao & Ors. AIR 1965 SC 1405
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Dr. Hakimwadi Tenants’ Association & Ors. AIR 1988 SC 233
Mallesappa Bandeppa Desai and another v. Desai Mallappa alias Mallesappa and another
Muniappa Naicker v. Balakrishna Naicker
Nagubai Ammal and others v. B. Shama Rao and others
N. Padmamma and others v. S. Ramakrishna Reddy and others
Naresh Charan Das Gupta v. Paresh Charan Das Gupta and another
Pratima Chowdhury v. Kalpana Mukherjee and another
P. Lakshmi Reddy v. L. Lakshmi Reddy
P. Subramania Chettiar v. Tmt. Amirtham and others
P.T. Munichikkanna Reddy and others v. Revamma and others
Rukhmabai v. Lata Laxminarayan and others
Ranganayaki Ammal and others v. S.R. Srinivasan and others
R. Selvaraj v. R. Radhakrishna Pillai @ R.R. Krishna Pillai and another
Ram Piari v. Bhagwant and others
Rabindra Nath Mukherjee v. Panchanan Banerjee
R. Vellingiri and another v. R. Kannaian and others
T. Anjanappa and others v. Somalingappa and another
Srinivas Krishnarao Kango v. Narayan Devli Kango and Ors. AIR 1954 SC 379
State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar and others
Sikkim Subba Associates v. State of Sikkim
Shyam Telelink Ltd. (now Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd.) v. Union of India
Shrinivas Krishnarao Kongo v. Narayan Devji Kango and others
Sadasiva Gounder and other v. Purushothaman
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.