SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 498

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Tvl. Super Recording Co. Ltd. , Rep. by its Managing Director – Appellant
Versus
Commercial Tax Officer – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:C. Baktha Siromani, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mohammed Shaffiq, Spl.Government Pleader (Taxes).

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer in W.P.NO.36497 OF 2006 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Respondent in his Proceedings in CST/33533/1999-2000 dated 24.07.2006 and quash the same.

W.P.NO.36865 OF 2006 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Respondent in his Proceedings in CST/33533/2000-01 dated 24.07.2006 and quash the same.

W.P.NO.36866 OF 2006 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Respondent in his Proceedings in TNGST/0640332/2000-01 dated 24.07.2006 and quash the same.)

1. The common issue that arises for consideration in these three Writ Petitions is whether the proceedings of the Respondent for revised assessment are barred by limitation.

2. The relevant facts relating to the assessment in the three cases are significant for the purpose of ascertaining the period of limitation. The relevant facts, in this


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top