Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Rupa Jaikishin Gangwani D/o. Late Jaikishin Gangwani – Appellant
Versus
D. V. S. Subbarao – Respondent
ORDER :
The Civil Revision Petition has been filed for a direction to direct the Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu to dispose of O.S.No.351 of 2022 on merits within a reasonable time frame as fixed by this Hon-ble Court.
2. The revision petitioner states that the respondents 1 and 2/ plaintiffs filed a Suit against the revision petitioner/5th defendant and respondents 3 and 4/defendants 1 and 2 in O.S.No.501 of 2009 before the District Munsif, Alandur for permanent injunction. Later, at the instance of the revision petitioner, the suit in O.S.No.501 of 2009 was transferred to the Principal District Court, Chengalpattu and re-numbered as O.S.No.351 of 2022.
3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner mainly contended that the revision petitioner is a Senior Citizen and aged about 76 years and therefore, speedy disposal is just and necessary. It is specifically contended that the Suit is pending for about 13 years.
4. Unnecessary adjournments on flimsy grounds would cause prejudice to the parties to the litigation. Rule is to conduct the case on the date it is posted for hearing. Adjournment is an exception. Thus, adjournments are to be granted only on genuine grounds and eve
The Court emphasized the need for genuine urgency or public interest to justify speedy disposal and highlighted the trust on the District Judiciary, the ill-motives of litigants, and the potential di....
Adjournments should be granted only on genuine grounds, and routine directions for speedy disposal of cases cannot be issued by the High Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
