BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Thangamani - Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Limited, Trichy & Another - Respondent
W.P.(MD). No. 16630 of 2020
Decided On : 25-03-2022
Mandamus - Electricity Connection - The court directed the first respondent to consider the petitioner's application for electricity service connection and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner and the second respondent, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the court's order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Writ Petition seeking a Mandamus to direct the first respondent to provide electricity connection to her house, as her application for electricity service connection had not been considered by the first respondent.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the first respondent to consider the petitioner's application for electricity service connection and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner and the second respondent, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the court's order.
Issues: The main issue was the consideration of the petitioner's application for electricity service connection, which was opposed by the second respondent on the ground of encroachment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's application for electricity service connection is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner and the second respondent.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was disposed of with the direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's application for electricity service connection and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the court's order.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to provide electricity connection to the petitioner's house situated in S.No.108, Door No.2/2A, Nadarpallam, Ayyampalayam, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy District within a stipulated time fixed by this Court.)
1. This Writ Petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the first respondent to provide electricity connection to the petitioner's house situated in Survey No.108, Door No.2/2A, Nadarpallam, Ayyampalayam, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy District based on the petitioner's representation application dated 16.10.2020 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. It is the contention of the petitioner that she is the owner of the aforementioned property and she is in possession and enjoyment of the same. She has applied for electricity service connection for her property with the first respondent on 16.10.2020. She has given several representations thereafter. Since her application has not been considered till date, she has filed this Writ Petition.
3. Heard Mr.S.M.Mohan Gandhi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, learned Standing Counsel, who accepts notice for the first respondent and Mr.C.Vakeeswaran, learned counsel, who accepts notice for the second respondent.
4. Learned counsel for the second respondent vehemently opposes the grant of electricity service connection in favour of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is an encroacher. According to him, Section 7 notice under the Land Encroachment Act has already been issued to the petitioner.
5. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner's application dated 16.10.2020 seeking for electricity service connection is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner as well as the second respondent and any other necessary party, whom the first respondent deems fit to enquire.
6. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the second respondent that objections have already been given to the first respondent on 17.07.2020 requesting the first respondent not to grant electricity service connection to the petitioner. It is for the respondents to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law.
7. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the first respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 16.10.2020 seeking for electricity service connection in her name for the property situated in Survey No.108, Door No.2/2A, Nadarpallam, Ayyampalayam, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy District and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner as well as the second respondent including granting them the right of personal hearing and also after giving due consideration to the objections raised by the second respondent through her written objections dated 17.07.2020, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
8. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
The court has the power to issue a Mandamus directing a public authority to perform its public duty, which includes considering applications for essential services such as electricity connection.
A property owner is entitled to receive electricity service, and utility providers are authorized to erect necessary infrastructure to facilitate such connection, provided ownership is established an....
The court emphasized the need for a fair hearing and consideration of applications for electricity service connection in accordance with the law, despite the pending ownership dispute.
The High Court has the authority under Article 226 to direct statutory electricity distribution authorities to process service connection applications within a specified timeframe, ensuring administr....
Electricity Connection - Duty of licensee to supply on request - It is duty of distribution licensee to provide connection to every eligible applicant by taking necessary steps for which respondents ....
The court emphasized the importance of affording a fair hearing to all parties involved in the dispute over electricity service connection for the property.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.