Back
R. VIJAYAKUMAR
A. Ranagapitchai Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: W.P(MD).No.5394 of 2012: This Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records and quash the order passed by the second respondent in his order dated 30.12.2011, Ref.No.K1/34483/2003-1 in respect of properties bearing Survey Numbers 434/6 and 435/2 in accordance with law.
W.P(MD).No.8495 of 2012: This Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the second respondent in Ref.No.K1/34483/2003-1 dated 30.12.2011 and quash the same in respect of properties in Gurunathanaickanur Village, Dindigul Taluk, bearing Survey Nos.434/6 and 435/2.)
Common Order:
1. The petitioners in both the writ petitions are challenging an order passed by the second respondent herein under which a patta has been granted in favour of the respondents 5 and 6.
2. The contentions of the petitioners are as follows:
(i).Survey Nos.435/2 and 434/6 in Gurunathanaikanur Village, Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District have been classified as Ayyappa Naicken Kulam. The tank is the source of irrigation for the petitioners and others for their agricultural properti
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of revenue records and settlement proceedings to determine the classification of land and the application of Section 14-A of ....
Point of law: none of the petitioners approached this Court with clean hands and thereby committed as many errors as possible in making requests, payment of land revenue etc. Such an issue cannot be ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the subject land was classified as 'Anadheenam' and vested with the Government under the Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryo....
Petitioner failed to establish timely claims and lineage rights for land ownership, justifying dismissal of appeals.
The court held that the petitioners could not claim rights to land classified as Government Poramboke due to the suppression of a material rectification deed, emphasizing the finality of orders under....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
