Back
V. M. VELUMANI, V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government, Housing & Urban Development Department, St. George Fort, Secretariat, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Second respondent to consider and dispose of the revised Application Receipt No.2022-23/ON/1846818 in PPA/WDCN06/01705/2023 dated 24.02.2023 submitted by the Petitioner within the time frame fixed by this Court.)
V.M. Velumani, J.
1. The petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the revised Application Receipt No.2022-23/ON/1846818 in PPA/WDCN06/01705/2023, dated 24.02.2023, submitted by the petitioner within a time frame fixed by this Court.
2. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the 1st respondent and Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice for respondents 2 to 4, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the entire materials on record.
4. According to petitioner, he is the owner of the property bearing Door No.309, Thiru.Vi.Ka.Nagar, 18th s
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's authority to direct the petitioner to rectify the defects within a specified time frame and permit the respondents to take appropriate ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for expeditious disposal of revision applications under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and the res....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of planning authorities to process pending applications under Section 113C and refrain from coercive action until the disposal of ....
Expeditious disposal of appeals under Section 80-A of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and the restraint of coercive steps against the petitioner.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the pending appeal and maintaining status quo until a decision is made.
The need for expeditious disposal of statutory appeals and the restraint on coercive steps by respondents pending disposal of the appeal.
Court granted time extension for building regularization plan submission due to medical reasons, directing de-sealing pending compliance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
