HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.M. VELUMANI, V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, JJ.
S. Kalyani Rani - Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Buildings, Chennai & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. No. 11086 of 2023 & W.M.P. No. 10954 of 2023
Decided On : 12-04-2023
Writ Petition - De-occupation Notice - Tamilnadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - The court directed the 4th respondent to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner within six months and restrained the respondents 1 to 3 from taking any coercive steps against the petitioner.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, claiming to be the absolute owner of a property, constructed three floors as per the approved plan. The respondents issued notices and a de-occupation notice, pending disposal of the statutory appeal made under Section 80-A of the Tamilnadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the 4th respondent to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner within six months and restrained the respondents 1 to 3 from taking any coercive steps against the petitioner.
Issues: Validity of the de-occupation notice and pending revision filed by the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for expeditious disposal of the petitioner's revision and restrained the respondents from taking coercive steps until the revision is disposed of.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction for the 4th respondent to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner within six months and restraining the respondents 1 to 3 from taking any coercive steps against the petitioner.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from initiating any action in pursuance of the De-occupation notice issued by the respondents 2 and 3 U/s. Section 56(2A) and 57 read with Section 85 of the Tamilnadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 in Notice No.Z.IX.TPENF/Dn-110/001/2023 dated 23.03.2023 for the property situated at Old No.21/1, New No.20/1, Palat Madhavan Road, Mahalingapuram, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034 pending disposal of the statutory Appeal made under the special provision U/s. 80A of the Tamilnadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.)
V.M. Velumani, J.
1. The petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition forbearing the respondents from initiating any action in pursuance of the De-occupation notice issued by the respondents 2 and 3 under Sections 56(2A) and 57 read with Section 85 of the Tamilnadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, in Notice No.Z.IX.TPENF/Dn-110/001/2023 dated 23.03.2023, for the property situated at Old No.21/1, New No.20/1, Palat Madhavan Road, Mahalingapuram, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034 pending disposal of the statutory Appeal made under the special provision under Section 80-A of the Tamilnadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
2. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. According to petitioner, she is the absolute owner of the property situate at Old No.21/1, New No.20/1, Palat Madhavan Road, Mahalingapuram, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. She put up construction of three floors after obtaining building permission from the Greater Chennai Corporation. The construction put up by the petitioner is as per the approved plan and some minimal changes were made by converting the balconies. Based on the complaint given by the petitioner''s brother-in-law, the respondents 2 & 3 issued notice dated 09.01.2023 to the petitioner under Sections 56 & 57 of the Tamilnadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, to produce the approved plan and to stop the work. The petitioner sent reply dated 24.01.2023, to the 2nd respondent and also produced the planning permission. While so, the respondents 2 & 3 and the Assistant Engineer after inspecting the petitioner''s property, issued Lock and Seal notice dated 17.02.2023 to the petitioner under Sections 56 and 57 read with Section 85 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, as amended by Act 61 of 2008. Therefore, the petitioner filed revision under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, before the 1st respondent on 14.03.2023. Pending revision, the respondents 2 & 3 issued De-occupation notice dated 23.03.2023 to the petitioner. Since, no order has been passed on the revision dated 14.03.2023, the petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition.
4. In view of the revision filed by the petitioner before 1st respondent is pending from 14.03.2023, this Court suo motu impleads ''The Principal Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009'' as 4th respondent in this Writ Petition and Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the newly impleaded 4th respondent.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the construction put up by the petitioner is as per the approved plan and there are only minimal changes in the said construction. As per the Combined Building Development Rules, there is provision for premium FSI and the petitioner is willing to pay necessary charges for the minimal additional area constructed and prayed for passing suitable orders.
6.Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the newly impleaded 4th respondent submitted that the petitioner''s revision dated 14.03.2023
The need for expeditious disposal of statutory appeals and the restraint on coercive steps by respondents pending disposal of the appeal.
Expeditious disposal of appeals under Section 80-A of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and the restraint of coercive steps against the petitioner.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for expeditious disposal of revision applications under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and the res....
Revisional authority must decide stay applications under S.80-A within 3 weeks; no coercive action during interim period.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of planning authorities to process pending applications under Section 113C and refrain from coercive action until the disposal of ....
The court directed the disposal of a pending revision petition under the Town and Country Planning Act within a time-bound period and granted interim protection against demolition until the outcome o....
A Writ of Mandamus can be issued to direct a statutory authority to process and dispose of a pending revision application within a specified timeframe, ensuring the principles of natural justice and ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adherence to approved construction plans and the legal implications of deviation from such plans under the Tamil Nadu Town and....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.