Back
V. M. VELUMANI, V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
A. Latha – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Building, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned notice bearing No.Z.O.VI.C.No.1440/2023 dated 18.02.2023 issued by 2nd respondent and quash the same as the same is arbitrary, illegal and premature.)
V.M. Velumani, J.
1. The petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition challenging the impugned notice dated 18.02.2023 issued by the 2nd respondent.
2. By consent of Mr.S.R.Rajagopal, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for Mr.M.Senthilkumar, learned counsel on record for the petitioner as well as Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
3. The petitioner is owner of the premises bearing Door No.1, Kattapomman street, Venkateshwara Nagar, Peravallur, Chennai-600 082. She has constructed the building and completed in the year 2012. The petitioner has put up construction in deviation from the approved plan. In view of the same, the respondents initiated action under Section 57 read with Section 85 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of planning authorities to process pending applications under Section 113C and refrain from coercive action until the disposal of ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for expeditious disposal of revision applications under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and the res....
Expeditious disposal of appeals under Section 80-A of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and the restraint of coercive steps against the petitioner.
The need for expeditious disposal of statutory appeals and the restraint on coercive steps by respondents pending disposal of the appeal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's authority to direct the petitioner to rectify the defects within a specified time frame and permit the respondents to take appropriate ....
The court emphasized the importance of considering the pending appeal and maintaining status quo until a decision is made.
Deviations from approved plans allow revised plan applications for regularisation; authorities must consider on merits before coercive action.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
