JUDGMENT :

1. Earlier, the appellant/writ petitioner approached this Court by filing Writ Petition in W.P.No.4690 of 2010, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to I.D.No.154 of 2006 and quash the award dated 23.12.2008 passed therein by the first respondent and further direct the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with back-wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits.

2. The above said Writ Petition was dismissed on 04.04.2012 by the learned Single Judge holding as follows:

"4. .... The Labour Court concurred with the finding of the enquiry officer that the petitioner committed irregularity and she is also equally responsible for issuing of jewel loan without verifying the genuineness of the jewel pledged and that too issuing the appraisal receipt after the payment of loan. It is held by the Labour Court that the petitioner had not disputed the irregularity committed by her. Based on the material evidence and considering the report of the enquiry officer marked as Ex.R-8 and the explanation given by the petitioner, the Labour Court came to