SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1250

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
N. SATISH KUMAR, J.
A. Devi – Appellant
Versus
S. Gayathri & Others – Respondents
C.M.A (MD)No. 36 of 2023 & C.M.P (MD)No. 1989 of 2023
Decided On : 06-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:N. Sudhagar Nagaraj, Advocate. For the Respondent:R2, S. Royce Immanuel, R3, Krishnakumar, Advocate.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the Disability Certificate issued by the Medical Board in enhancing the compensation for the appellant.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation Enhancement - The court enhanced the compensation for the appellant based on the Disability Certificate issued by the Medical Board, increasing the total compensation from Rs.1,04,614/- to Rs. 1,28,614/- with interest at the rate of 7.5%pa from the date of award till the date of deposit.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant and others were traveling in a bus when a lorry collided with the bus, causing injuries. Claim petitions were filed, and the Tribunal awarded compensation. The appellant challenged the award, citing the ignored Disability Certificate issued by the Medical Board.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petition to receive additional evidence and disposed of the appeal based on the Disability Certificate, enhancing the compensation for the appellant.

Issues: The main issue was the ignored Disability Certificate and the adequacy of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the Disability Certificate issued by the Medical Board, which indicated a 15% disability and a fracture in the right hand, leading to an enhancement of the compensation for the appellant.

Final Decision: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was partly allowed, enhancing the compensation from Rs.1,04,614/- to Rs. 1,28,614/- with interest at the rate of 7.5%pa from the date of award till the date of deposit.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.95 of 2022, dated 1.8.2022, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/The Special Sub-Judge, Tiruchirappalli seeking enhancement of compensation of Rs.1,00,000/-)

1. Challenging the order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.95 of 2022, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed.

2. The appellant along with others were travelling in the Transport Corporation bus bearing Registration NO.TN63 N 1233 and proceeding from Pudukkottai to Trichy. At that time, the lorry bearing Registration No.TN30 S 9735 came from the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the third respondent bus. As a result, the appellant sustained multiple grievous injuries and fractures in the right hand and all others have also sustained various injuries. Therefore claim petitions have been preferred by them.

3. The second respondent insurer of the lorry denied the rash and negligence on the part of the driver and took a stand that the third respondent Corporation driver came in the middle of the road which resulted in the accident. The third respondent has blamed the driver of the lorry for the accident. All the injured has filed claim petitions and the Tribunal by way of common judgment dated 1.8.2022 passed an award in respect of the injured. Challenging the award passed by the Tribunal in respect of the appellant, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal came to be filed.

4. The main ground on which the challenge has been made is that the Tribunal, has in fact, ignored to rely the Certificate issued by the Medical Board in M.C.O.P.No.95 of 2022, wherein, the disability of 15% has been clearly arrived at by the Medical Board. Despite, the above documents filed before the Tribunal, the same has not been considered and the Tribunal has passed a just compensation as simple injury is caused and on that head, a sum of Rs.25,000/- alone has been awarded. Hence the appeal is filed only in respect of the particular head.

5. The learned counsel for the appellant mainly would submit immediately after disposal of the M.C.O.P., he has applied for certified copies from the same Tribunal. The Tribunal has issued the certified copy to the learned counsel on 3.9.2022, however, the same has not been marked in the original proceedings and petition to receive additional evidence is also filed before this Court and seeks to remand the matter back to the Tribunal.

6. Heard Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.S.Royce Immanuel, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent and perused the materials plaed before this Court.

7. On a perusal of the certified copies filed as additional documents before this Court, the Medical Board has assessed the disability as early as on 29.3.2021 and those documents were very much available in the Court and the same has been fortified with the certified copies issued by the Tribunal. In such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the documents filed before this Court are not considered. Accordingly, the Petition to receive the additional evidence is allowed before this Court, since the disability certificate issued by the Medical Board is not disputed by others. Instead of remanding the matter back to the Tribunal, this Court is inclined to dispose of the appeal based on the Disability Certificate.

8. The Disability Certificate issued by the Medical Board indicates that the Medical Board had assessed the Disability at 15% and only fracture was noticed in the right hand. In such view of the matter, if the disability is taken note of for each percentage, the normal compensation is Rs.3000/- and if the same is calculated for 15%, the compensation would be 45,000/-,whereas, the Tribunal has awarded only Rs.25,000/- towards simple injury. In such view of the matter, the compensation(simple injury) is enha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top