HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
S. Gunasri D/o. Sankar, Chennai - Appellant
Versus
E. Chandramouli S/o. E. Krishnamurthy, Chennai & Anr. - Respondents
C.M.A. No. 2013 of 2021
Decided On : 03-01-2024
Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation for Injuries - The court confirmed that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the 1st Respondent's vehicle. The claim Petitioner's disability was assessed as 5% partial and permanent, leading to an enhancement of the compensation amount from Rs.48,200 to Rs.75,000.
Fact of the Case:
The claim Petitioner sought compensation for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident. The Tribunal awarded Rs.48,200 with interest. The Appellant appealed for enhancement of the amount.
Finding of the Court:
The court confirmed the negligence of the 1st Respondent's driver, accepted the 5% partial and permanent disability of the claim Petitioner, and enhanced the compensation to Rs.75,000.
Issues: Compensation amount, Disability assessment, Negligent driving
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the evidence of injuries and disability, and the negligent driving, leading to the enhancement of the compensation amount.
Final Decision: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was partly allowed, enhancing the award amount to Rs.75,000. The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced amount, and the claim Petitioner was permitted to withdraw the entire enhanced award amount.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree in MCOP.No.6599 of 2015 dated 23.04.2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/(Special Sub Court No.1, Motor Accident Claims Petitions) Small Causes Court, Chennai.)
1. The Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree made in MCOP.No.6599 of 2015 dated 23.04.2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/(Special Sub Court No.1, Motor Accident Claims Petitions) Small Causes Court, Chennai.
2. The claim Petitioner is the Appellant herein. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.
3. The claim Petitioner filed MCOP.No.6599 of 2015, seeking compensation for the injuries sustained by her in a road traffic accident occurred on 28.02.2015. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.48,200/- with interest at the rate of 7.5%. Aggrieved against the same and seeking enhancement, she has preferred this Appeal.
4. The factum of the accident, manner of the accident, rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the 1stRespondent's vehicle, insured with the 2ndRespondent are not under challenge in this Appeal. Accordingly, the finding rendered by the trial Court that the accident taken place due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the 1stRespondent's vehicle, insured with the 2ndRespondent are hereby confirmed.
5. During the trial, on the side of the claim Petitioner, PW1 was examined, Ex.P1 to Ex.P.7 were marked and on the side of the Respondents, none was examined and no document was marked and Ex.C1/Disability Certificate issued by the Medical Board was marked as court document.
6. Heard the learned counsel for the claim Petitioner and learned counsel for the Insurance Company on the point of quantum of compensation.
7. On perusal of the oral evidence of PW1 coupled with Ex.P1/copy of FIR, Ex.P.2/OP Chit & Ex.P.3/Transport bills, I find that the FIR copy and OP chit, filed by the Petitioner as Ex.P1 and Ex.P2, respectively clearly proves the injuries sustained by the claim Petitioner due to the accident and the treatment taken by her. There is no surgical intervention on the Petitioner. To prove the disability caused to the Petitioner, she has appeared before the medical board. After assessing the Petitioner's disability, the Medical Board has issued Ex.C1/disability certificate. The Medical Board considering the injuries has assessed the disability of the claim Petitioner as 5%. The claim Petitioner had sustained injury in left lower limb. Considering that only 5% disability was assessed by the Medical Board and the same must be partial and permanent only. This Court accepts the disability as 5% partial and permanent as per Ex.C1.
8. Taking into consideration the nature of the injuries sustained and the disability suffered by the claim Petitioner/Appellant and in the interest of justice, I am of the considered view that the amount awarded by the Tribunal has to be enhanced to Rs.75,000/-, as consolidated amount which is inclusive of interest.
9. In total, the claim Petitioner is entitled to a sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees seventy five thousand only).
10. In fine,
(i) this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands partly allowed, enhancing the award amount from Rs.48,200/- to Rs.75,000/- to the extent indicated above.
(ii) the Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced award amount before the Tribunal, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, less the amount, if any already deposited.
(iii) on such deposit being made, the claim Petitioner/Appellant is permitted to withdraw the entire enhanced award amount, less the award amount, if any, already withdrawn, by filing necessary application before the Tribunal.
(iv) the claim Petitioner/Appellant is directed to pay the court fee, if any, for the enhanced compensation amount and the Registry is dir
The court considered the nature of injuries, disability assessment, and negligent driving in determining the compensation amount.
The court enhanced the compensation due to inadequate prior assessment of disability and emphasized the importance of medical evidence in determining just compensation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to enhance compensation based on the cost of living and legal precedents.
The appellate court enhanced compensation due to inadequate initial damages despite claimant's failure to fully substantiate loss of income or future medical expenses.
The court applied the ratio laid down in Rajkumar's case to determine the disability percentage and adopted the multiplier method for compensation calculation.
The court has the authority to modify the compensation awarded by the Tribunal based on the evidence and nature of the injury suffered by the appellant.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the Disability Certificate issued by the Medical Board in enhancing the compensation for the appellant.
The court established that proper medical evidence is crucial in assessing disability for compensation claims under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The court has the authority to enhance the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal based on the assessment of evidence and the nature of injuries sustained.
The court applied the Rights of Persons with Disability Act, 2016 and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SARLA VERMA & OTHER v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Another to determine the loss o....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.