IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.SUNDAR, R. SAKTHIVEL, JJ.
Gengammal – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri & Others – Respondents
H.C.P. No. 1307 of 2023
Decided On : 20-07-2023
Habeas Corpus - Missing Daughter - The court disposed of the Habeas Corpus Petition filed by the petitioner seeking the production of the petitioner's missing daughter. The court directed the jurisdictional police to continue the investigation and produce the missing daughter before the jurisdictional Magistrate once located, preserving the rights of all concerned parties.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's daughter was missing, and a complaint had been lodged with the jurisdictional police. The Habeas Corpus Petition was filed on the apprehension that the daughter may be in illegal custody.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the jurisdictional police to continue the investigation and produce the missing daughter before the jurisdictional Magistrate once located, preserving the rights of all concerned parties.
Issues: Missing person case, illegal custody, jurisdictional police investigation
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the jurisdictional police to continue the investigation and take necessary steps to locate the missing daughter, while preserving the rights of all concerned parties.
Final Decision: The Habeas Corpus Petition was disposed of with the directive for the jurisdictional police to continue the investigation and produce the missing daughter before the jurisdictional Magistrate once located, preserving the rights of all concerned parties.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the petitioner''s daughter XXX, D/o.Selvam, aged about 17 years, before this Court from the illegal custody of the 3rd respondent and handover to the petitioner.)
M. SUNDAR, J
1. This order will now dispose of the captioned ''Habeas Corpus Petition'' [hereinafter ''HCP'' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].
2. The central theme of the captioned HCP is, petitioner''s daughter ''XXX'' [hereinafter ''absentee'' for the sake of convenience and clarity, to be noted, name is masked] is missing from 04.06.2023, a complaint in this regard has been lodged by the petitioner with jurisdictional police (second respondent), the same has been taken on record as Crime No.66 of 2023 on the file of second respondent and the absentee has not been located as yet but captioned HCP has been filed in this Court on 11.07.2023 on the apprehension that absentee may be in illegal custody of third respondent.
3. Issue notice to official respondents.
4. Mr.E.Raj Thilak, learned State Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice for official respondents and submits on instructions (instructed by Mr.R.Vignesh, Sub Inspector of Police, Hogenakkal Police Station) that pursuant to the aforementioned complaint dated 05.06.2023 (Crime No.66 of 2023), investigation was kick started, a special team has been formed, investigation thus far does not show any trappings of illegal custody or unlawful detention and the jurisdictional police is hopeful of locating the absentee in ten weeks from today i.e., by 29.09.2023.
5. Let the investigation proceed in accordance with law uninfluenced by this HCP order.
6. On the absentee being located, let the absentee be produced before the jurisdictional Magistrate with prior intimation to the HCP petitioner (absentee''s mother). The jurisdictional Magistrate to proceed in accordance with law. We are informed that the jurisdictional Magistrate is Judicial Magistrate, Pennagaram. We requisition a report from Judicial Magistrate, Pennagaram, which shall be placed before us in the next listing under cause list caption ''FOR REPORT''. Registry is directed to communicate a copy of this order to learned Judicial Magistrate, Pennagaram. We make it clear that all the rights of third respondent (private respondent) and anyone else concerned with this case are preserved as captioned HCP is disposed of in the Admission Board albeit with notice to official respondents.
7. If there is undue delay or if there is any other development, we make it clear that all the rights and contentions of the petitioner or anyone concerned for the absentee are preserved and left open for being raised in collateral or similar proceedings. Further we make it clear that it is open to the petitioner to come back to this Court not only with a similar but even same prayer if there are other developments and if the need arises. All the rights of all concerned are preserved.
8. Captioned HCP is disposed of with the aforementioned observations / directives. There shall be no order as to costs.
9. Though captioned HCP has been disposed of, Registry is directed to list the matter under the cause list caption ''FOR REPORT WITH STATEMENTS'' on 03.10.2023.
Preservation of rights of all concerned parties in a missing person case
A habeas corpus legal drill will not be embarked upon in cases where there is no illegal detention or illegal custody.
The legal principle established is that the court will consider the age and marital status of the individual in habeas corpus cases to determine the presence of illegal detention or unlawful custody.
The main legal point established is that the absence of illegal detention or custody is crucial in determining the applicability of a Habeas Corpus Petition.
The main legal point established is that the court will not issue a writ of habeas corpus if the missing person is found to have voluntarily left and not illegally detained.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to dispose of a Habeas Corpus Petition after the subject of the petition is located and brought before the court, and adequat....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to ensure the liberty of individuals through habeas corpus petitions and to determine the legality of detentions.
Custody of a minor child by relatives after a parent's death does not constitute illegal detention, and custody disputes should be addressed through appropriate legal proceedings.
The autonomy of a major individual to decide their own course of action, irrespective of the validity of their marriage, is a fundamental principle upheld by the court.
Adult daughter's autonomy in consensual relationship and independent living upheld in habeas corpus petition.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.