N. SATHISH KUMAR
Hasina Begum (Died) – Appellant
Versus
Shoukath Ali – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of C.P.C. 1908, against the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 448 of 1986 dated 24.04.1990, by the learned V Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichy.
1. This Appeal Suit has been remanded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 20036 of 2017, on the ground that the High Court reversed the decree passed by the trial Court only on the ground that no issue as to the vesting of the property in wakf has been framed by the trial Court. After remanding, this matter has been heard afresh.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to herein, as per their own ranking before the trial Court.
3. The brief facts leading to the filing of this Appeal Suit are as follows:
Chhedi Lal Misra (Dead) through LRs. vs. Civil Judge Lucknow and Others
Garib Das and Ros vs. Munshi Abdul Hamid and Others
Joseph Carls, Xavier Louis vs. Stanislaus Costa and Others
L.C. Hanumanthappa (Since Dead), Represented by his legal Representatives vs. H.B. Shivakumar
Prem Singh and Others vs. Birbal and Others
Mohd. Khasim vs. Mohd. Dastagir and Others
T.N. Wakf Board vs. Hathija Ammal (Dead) by LRs. and Others
Wakf Board A.P. Represented by its Secretary vs. Biradavolu Ramana Reddy
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cancellation of the settlement deed and subsequent sales of properties indicated no valid Wakf was created, and the plaintiffs' conduct sh....
The irreversibility of wakf property transactions based on the Wakf Act's provisions prohibits alienation, upholding the integrity of religious and charitable purposes over contested claims.
The property was determined to be Wakf, with sales executed without the Wakf Board's sanction declared void, affirming the Muthavalli's right to maintain the suit.
The court asserted that ownership disputes under the Wakf Act do not preclude valid claims from individuals claiming title, regardless of Wakf notifications, provided they can substantiate their owne....
Service inam lands for religious mosque services constitute inalienable wakf property; title claims via partition/sales thereon invalid; plaintiffs must prove independent title, not rely on defence w....
Court emphasizes validity of property ownership claims; defendants failed to substantiate allegations of fraud against the execution of property exchange deeds.
Important PointGrants by way of service inams for the purposes recognized by the muslim law as pious, religious or charitable would clothe the property with character of wakf.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.