SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1050

SANJAY V. GANGAPURWALA, P. D. AUDIKESAVALU
Info Edge (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Google India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.P.Chidambaram Senior Counsel, Mr.Sriram Panchu Senior Counsel, Mr.Satish Parasaran Senior Counsel, Mr.Srinath Sridevan Senior Counsel Assisted by:, Mr.R.Venkat Raman, Mr.Santhosh Ukkur, Mr.Abir Roy, Mr.D.Senthil Kumar, Mr.Anirudh B.Menon, Mr.Harinarayanan.S.K., Mr.Sachin Menon, Mr.Deva Kumar, Mr.Vivek Pandey, Mr.Aman Shankar, Mrs.Sukanya Vishwanath and, Mr.Arvind Srinivas, Mr.Arun C.Mohan Assisted by Mr.Abir Roy, Ms.Shruthi Srinivasan, Mr.Karthik Selvaraj and, Mr.Aman Shankar
For the Respondent: Mr.P.S.Raman Senior Counsel for Mr.G.Balasubramanian for M/s.Leela & Co. Mr.Sajan Poovayya Senior Counsel for Mr.G.Balasubramanian for M/s.Leela & Co. Assisted by: Mr.S.Anand, Mr.Jesin Prabhu George, Mr.S.Girish, Mr.P.Arun Kumar, Mr.Vijayendra Pratap Singh, Ms.Sayobani Basu, Mr.Raghav Seth, Ms.Shubhangni Jain, Mr.Ankitesh Ojha, Ms.Maithreyi Canthaswamy Sharma, Mr.Krishna Sumanth, Ms.Lakshana Viravalli, Mr.Raghav Seth and Mr.Chetan Chawla

JUDGMENT :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE

Prayer: Appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 r/w Order 43 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure r/w Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original Side Rules to set aside the decree and judgment dated 03.08.2023 in A.No.3101 of 2023 in C.S.(Comm. Div.) No.120 of 2023 and consequentially direct the Single Judge of the High Court of Madras to restore the Suit in C.S.(Comm. Div.) No.120 of 2023.

The present appellants are the original plaintiffs. For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred to with their original status in the plaints.

2. The plaintiffs instituted suits seeking a declaration that the Google Payments Terms of Service-Seller (IN) posted on 02.06.2022, Payment Policies, Policies relating to Service Fees, Terms and Conditions, posted by the defendants' on its websites/portals/ webpages on various dates, including the Blog-post dated 17.05.2023, all relating to the implementation of Google Play Billing System (GPBS)/User Choice Billing (UCB)/Consumption-Based Model vis-a-vis the Mobile Application as illegal and unenforceable. The plaintiffs further sought a declaration that the definition o

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top