SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1130

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
P. VELMURUGAN, K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ.
Shanthi - Petitioner
Versus
Our Lady of Assumption Church, Represented by its Parish Priest & Ors. - Respondents
CONT.P.(MD) No.843 of 2024 and W.P.(MD) No.17432 of 2023
Decided On : 22-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. J. David Ganesan.
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Sarangan, Addl. Govt. Pleader.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court emphasized that compliance with court orders is essential, and the removal of encroachments by authorities negated the basis for contempt proceedings.

Headnote:

CONTEMPT - DISOBEDIENCE OF COURT ORDER - The court addressed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, focusing on the wilful disobedience of a prior court order. The court noted that the authorities had acted on the matter by removing the encroachment, leading to the closure of the contempt petition without costs, while allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies if necessary.

Fact of the Case:

The contempt petition was filed against Respondents 1 to 3 for their alleged wilful disobedience of a court order from W.P.(MD) No.17432 of 2023, dated 29.11.2023, which directed the petitioner to submit necessary documents to the authorities within seven days.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the authorities had complied with the order by removing the encroachment, thus addressing the petitioner's concerns.

Issues: Whether the respondents willfully disobeyed the court's order and whether contempt proceedings were warranted.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that since the authorities had acted on the matter and removed the encroachment, there was no basis for the contempt petition.

Result: The contempt petition was closed without costs, and the petitioner was advised to seek remedies through appropriate legal channels if desired.

ORDER :

P. Velmurugan, J.

[PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying this Court to punish the Contemnors/Respondents 1 to 3 for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD) No.17432 of 2023, dated 29.11.2023.]

The Contempt Petition is filed seeking to punish the Contemnors/Respondents 1 to 3 for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P(MD) No.17432 of 2023, dated 29.11.2023.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

3. This Court while disposing of the above Writ Petition on 29.11.2023, observed that though this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ Petition, the petitioner may submit all the necessary documents along with say to the authorities concerned within a period of seven days from today. If the same is submitted, the authority may consider it on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereafter.

4. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2 to 4 would submit that the authorities have proceeded with the matter and that they have removed the encroachment.

5. In view of the above submission, the Contempt Petition is closed. No costs. Still the Petitioner is having any grievance, he is at liberty to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum, in the manner known to law, if so advised.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top