SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, R.VIJAYAKUMAR, JJ.
The Principal Secretary/Commissioner of Commercial Taxes – Appellant
Versus
D.Murugesan – Respondent
W.A(MD).Nos.4, 22 & 615 of 2020 and CMP(MD).Nos.31, 254 & 3917 of 2020
Decided on : 29-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr.Veera.Kathiravan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr.R.Venkataraman Senior Counsel For Mr.J.Pooventhera Rajan

Employees who voluntarily accept transfer conditions forfeiting seniority cannot later claim it, as their seniority is maintained division-wise under applicable service rules.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service Rules - Rule 11 and Rule 20 - Transfer of employees within the Commercial Taxes Department - Petitioners challenged the condition of forfeiting seniority upon transfer - Writ Court held that such condition was not applicable as transfers were within the same department - State appealed against the decision. (Paras 4, 12, 34)

(B) Seniority - The court ruled that employees who voluntarily accepted transfers and agreed to forgo seniority cannot later claim it, as their seniority is maintained division-wise. (Paras 26, 36)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners were transferred within the Commercial Taxes Department and challenged the condition to forgo seniority, arguing it was contrary to service rules.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioners had voluntarily accepted the condition to forgo seniority and that the writ Court's interpretation of the rules was incorrect.

Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to retain their seniority upon transfer within the same department.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners' acceptance of the transfer conditions precluded them from later claiming seniority, as the transfers were treated as administrative necessity.

Result: Writ appeals allowed.

JUDGMENT :

(Made by R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.)

Prayer in WA(MD).No.4 of 2020 : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed by the learned Judge in W.P.No. 2656 of 2013 dated 22.11.2018.

Prayer in WA(MD).No.22 of 2020 : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed by the learned Judge in W.P.No. 2657 of 2013 dated 22.11.2018.

Prayer in WA(MD).No.615 of 2020 : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed by the learned Judge in W.P.No. 2658 of 2013 dated 22.11.2018.

All the writ appeals arising out of final orders passed by the writ court in W.P.(MD).Nos.2656 to 2658 of 2013.

2. Since a common issue relating to seniority on being transferred to another division in the Commercial Department is under dispute, all the writ appeals are tagged together and a common order is being passed.

3. The petitioners in the writ petitions have challenged the orders passed by the Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai wherein the authorities had held that the petitioners on being transferred from one division to another division on request transfer, after having expressed their willingness to forego seniority, will not be entitled to retain or restore their seniority in the transferred division. Challenging the same, the petitioners have filed the above said writ petitions.

4. The writ Court after considering the submissions made on either side, had relied upon Rule 20 of the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service and proceeded to hold that the petitioners having been transferred within the Commercial Taxes Department and not from one department to another department, the question of surrendering or forgoing of seniority would not arise.

5. On the above said observations, the writ Court had allowed the writ petitions and directed the authorities to restore their original seniority that were conferred upon them in their original place of appointment. Challenging the same, the State has filed the present writ appeal.

(A) Facts leading to the filing of the present writ appeals are as follows:

6. The petitioner in WP(MD).No.2656 of 2013 (WA(md).No.4 of 2020) was appointed as a Typist in the Commercial Taxes Department at Thanjavur falling within Trichy Division on 03.01.1997. He was promoted as an Assistant on 16.06.2006. He had addressed a representation on 31.01.2007 to transfer himself to Madurai Commercial Taxes Division. The authority had forwarded the said representation to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission on 19.07.2008 and after obtaining concurrence from the Commission, the transfer order was passed on 20.05.2009. Therefore, he had challenged the order of transfer dated 20.05.2009 with regard to the portion wherein he was asked to forgo his seniority.

7. The petitioner in W.P(MD).No.2567 of 2013 (WA(md).No.22 of 2020) was originally appointed as Junior Assistant through Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission on 11.10.1994 to Trichy Commercial Taxes Division. Subsequently, she was promoted as Assistant on 09.06.2006. She made a representation on 30.04.2007 seeking transfer to Madurai Commercial Taxes Division. The said request was acceded to after getting concurrence from the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and transfer orders were passed on 03.10.2008 with a condition that she should forego her seniority.

The portion of the order of transfer which directs the petitioner to forego her seniority is put to challenge.

8. The petitioner in W.P(MD).No.2658 of 2013 (WA(md).No.615 of 2020) was originally appointed as as Junior Assistant through TNPSC on 05.03.1998 and allotted to Tirunelveli Commercial Taxes Division. He was promoted as Assistant on 31.05.2006. He submitted a representation on 25.07.2007 request one way transfer to Madurai Division. Her application was accepted and after getting concurrence fro

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top