IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SANJAY V. GANGAPURWALA, C.J., D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
I.H. Sekar - Petitioner
Versus
The Additional Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Revenue and Disaster Management Department - Respondent
W.P.No.7349 of 2020
Decided On : 02-02-2024
ORDER :
(D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.)
(Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Government Order in G.O.(Ms).No.155 Revenue [LD7(2)] Department, dated 16.05.2014 issued by the 1st respondent transferring an extent of 3.23.80 Hectares out of 15.30.00 Hectares of land in S.No.176 of Karapakkam village, Sholinganallur taluk, Chennai district in favour of 7th respondent and to quash the same and consequently, direct the 3rd respondent to cancel the revisions made in the revenue records pursuant to the impugned order.)
A. Prelude:
| I | II |
| The city of Chennai and the adjoining areas are dry areas known for hot and humid conditions. They receive rains on very few days in a year. | The city of Chennai and the adjoining areas have innumerable wetlands including Ramsar site of Pallikaranai marshland and different types of wetlands including Marine, Estuarine, Lacustrine, Riverine, and Palustrine wetlands all around. |
| The city of Chennai and its adjoining districts suffer from acute water shortage necessitating bringing in drinking water from the Krishna river from Srisailam to Chennai by constructing a canal of about 300 kms and Cauvery river water from Veeranam lake by constructing a pipeline of 235 kms. De-salination plants are also built to augment supply from Sea Water | The city of Chennai and its adjoining districts repeatedly face flood threats, millions of houses and properties submerge under the water and the estimated loss on account of the floods in the year 2015 is Rs.300 crores and in the year 2023 is Rs.2000 crores. The Government is spending more than 2000 crores in building storm water drains. |
1.1. Ironically, all of the above in column - I & II are true and in this background, we proceed to decide the present case.
B. The Petition :
2. This Writ Petition is filed challenging G.O.(Ms).No.155 Revenue [LD7(2)] Department, dated 16.05.2014, thereby, transferring an extent of 3.23.80 hectares out of 15.30.00 hectares of land in S.No.176 of Karapakkam village, Sholinganallur taluk, Chennai district in favour of the seventh respondent and to quash the same and consequently, direct the third respondent to cancel the revisions made in the revenue records pursuant to the impugned order and for such further or other orders.
C. The Case of the Parties:
3. This is a Public Interest Litigation filed by the petitioner who is the Founder and Managing Trustee of an organisation namely, The Nature Trust, formed with an object of protecting the environment and natural resources.
3.1. It is the case of the petitioner that about 38 acres of land in S.No.176, Karapakkam village, Sholinganallur taluk, Chennai district is classified as ‘Backwaters’ in the revenue records. The said land lies adjacent to Buckingham Canal. It is a wetland which the respondents are legally bound to protect and preserve from alienation, reclassification or conversion into alternate uses. The Buckingham Canal receives excess water from Pallikaranai marshlands and discharges into the Sea and acts as a protective shield for the Chennai city. It is extremely crucial to avoid / mitigate the effects of floods during excess rains and high tides in the Sea such as Tsunami. It is with this crucial purpose, much low lying wetlands on either side of Buckingham Canal are classified as backwaters. While so, subdividing an extent of 3.23.80 hectares by the impugned Government Order, the same is alienated to the seventh respondent to establish a campus for the Indian Statistical Institute. Upon coming to know of the same, the petitioner filed A.No.247 of 2016 before the National Green Tribunal, Southern Zone, Chennai to restrain the respondents from putting up any kind of construction in such backwater lands. However, the National Green Tribunal, Southern Zone, Chennai held that it lacks jurisdiction to deal with the
T.K. Shanmugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
M.C. Mehta Vs. Kamal Nath and Ors.
The court emphasized the Public Trust Doctrine, ruling that wetlands must be protected from alienation for private use, reaffirming their importance for public benefit and environmental sustainabilit....
Point of law : water bodies cannot be alienated even if they are dry and cultivation carried on dried bed of water bodies does not denude land of its character as water bodies.
The court emphasized the importance of following the rules of natural justice, considering all relevant documents and orders, and providing an opportunity to the parties to present their case before ....
The inquiry under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act must focus solely on impacts to neighbouring paddy lands, disregarding irrelevant criteria for application reje....
The duty to restore and conserve wetlands is a constitutional responsibility, overriding private property disputes, under the East Kolkata Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Act, 2006.
The State Government does not have the power to review its own orders unless such power is specifically conferred by statute. The State Government cannot exercise its power of review after a long del....
The main legal point established in this judgment is that the petitioner failed to establish the existence of the Siddapura Lotus Pond on the disputed land and that the grants made to private individ....
The court reaffirmed the need for practical assessment criteria based on direct evidence when determining suitability for land classification under the conservation act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that disputed questions of fact relating to title and possession should be decided by the competent civil court, and the power of judicial review i....
Protection of prohibited land and removal of illegal encroachments under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.