BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
State, through Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Special Crimes Branch, Chennai. (RC.5, 6 & 8/(S)/1994/CBI/SCB/Chennai) - Appellant
Versus
Asmath Kamal Choudry @ Hasmath Khan – Respondent
CRL.A(MD).No.406 of 2019
Decided On : 03-04-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cbi appeals for enhanced sentence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of the offence and trial proceedings. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments for enhancing sentence and convicting under remaining charges. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's analysis of facts and legal principles involved. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. examination of evidence presented and its validity. (Para 10) |
| 6. discussion on conspiracy and evidence corroboration. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. detailed examination of witness testimonies and their significance. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. prosecution's ability to prove accusations beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 25) |
| 9. decision on appeal based on established legal standards. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. court's decision to impose penalty and consider mitigating circumstances. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 11. concluding remarks on prison record provisions and health care. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
JUDGMENT :
(K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.)
CBI filed this appeal under Section 377(2) of Cr.P.C. to allow the Criminal Appeal, (i) to enhance the sentence imposed on the Respondent/Accused-9 Asmath Kamal Choudry by the learned II Additional District and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Madurai, by virtue of judgment dated 26.05.2017 at par with the sentence imposed on other accused persons for the offences punishable u/sec.120-B r/w 420 IPC and (ii) to convict the Respondent/Accused-9 Asmath Kamal Choudry for the offences punishable u/sec.120-B r/w 419, 467, 468, 471 r/w 511 IPC and additional charges u/sec.120-B r/w 420, 419, 467, 468, 381, 471 r/w 511 IPC.
2. The respondent in Crl.A.(MD).No.406 of 2019 was originally arrayed as A9 in the C.C.No. 5 of 1998 on the file of the II Additional District Court for CBI Cases, Madurai.
3.Brief facts of the case:
He and others are said to have committed offences under section 120 (b) r/w. 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 of I.P.C. and 381 of I.P.C. and section 13 (2) r/w. 13 (1)(d) of P.C. Act 1988. The CBI registered the cases in R.C5,6 &8/S/94/CBI/SCB/MAS on 11.03.1994 on the strength of the source information alleging that the appellant and other persons had entered into conspiracy and stealthily removed two blank DD books each containing 100 leaves bearing numbers 008901 to 009000, one from bank of India, DN Road Branch Bombay and another D.D book containing 100 leaves bearing numbers 536901 to 537000 from to the Bank of Maharashtra, Ghatkoper East Branch, Bombay in the year 1992 and 1993. Thereafter they forged signature of the bank officials of Mumbai and fabricated four demand drafts of bank of india , bombay bearing Nos. 008925, 008927, 008928 and 008926 for the value of Rs.38,35,800/- and presented in the fictitious account opened by A1 in the name of Sri Murugan textile by giving fictitious address and impersonating himself as Ramesh as proprietor of the said textile in the Canara Bank, Ramnad Road Branch, Madurai with the active participation of A2 (Sub Staff with the Canara Bank) and A5 (Manager of the said branch). A1 presented the forged DDs on various dates and credited the amount in fictitious account and clandestinely withdrawn the said amount through two bearer cheques in the fictitious names of Ganesan and Venkatachalapathy with the active aid of A2 and A5 and further attempted to encash cvertain amount by presenting two forged DD bearing Nos.536901 and 7593 in the bank of Maharastra, which created suspicion and enquiry was made and the act of forgery was found out. Therefore, the said attempt was aborted. Thereafter, on receiving the source information, CBI registered various cases in R.C5,6 &8/S/94/CBI/SCB/MAS on 11.03.1994 and conducted the investigation and filed the common final report in the above three crime numbers against the appellant and other persons as stated below :-
A1.Raveendran,
A2.Balasubramanian,
A3. Nana Mahadev Jadav
A4. Prakash RAmachandra Payer
A5.Abdul Aziz
A6.Salim Siraj Gilani
A7.Ramasamy
A8.Muthukrishnan,
A9.Asmat Kamal Choudhry @ Hashmat Khan
3.1. The II Addi
Swarn Singh v. State of Punjab
Sevaka Perumal v. State of T.N.
Gopal Singh v. State of Uttarakhand
The appellate court can overturn acquittals where the trial court's findings are perverse or unsustainable based on evidence, emphasizing the need for appropriate sentencing in cases of conspiracy an....
The court ruled that acquittals in conspiracy cases must be based on a holistic appreciation of evidence, rejecting selective readings that undermine victims' rights and public justice.
The conviction for conspiracy and bank fraud under various IPC sections is upheld based on corroborative testimony despite the absence of approvers in trial due to abscondence.
Evidence from prior proceedings can be utilized against an absconded accused, despite the absence of key witnesses, particularly in complex economic crimes.
The court ruled that the trial judge's acquittal was based on irrelevant contradictions, while the evidence established a clear demand and acceptance of bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The judgment emphasizes the need for independent evidence for each offense, the distinct and independent nature of certain offenses, and the application of section 26 of the General Clauses Act in de....
Convictions confirmed despite appeals; conspiracies in financial fraud established through corroborated evidence, with sentences mitigated based on health conditions.
The court upheld convictions for conspiracy under the Prevention of Corruption Act but granted probation considering the advanced age of offenders and time elapsed since the offence, emphasizing disc....
The court held that the appellant's actions constituted cheating and forgery, emphasizing misuse of authority and intent to deceive in bank transactions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.