SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2550

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
State, through Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Special Crimes Branch, Chennai. (RC.5, 6 & 8/(S)/1994/CBI/SCB/Chennai) - Appellant 
Versus
Asmath Kamal Choudry @ Hasmath Khan – Respondent
CRL.A(MD).No.406 of 2019
Decided On : 03-04-2025


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. N. Mohideen Basha, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI
For the Respondent: Mr. S.M.A. Jinnah.

The appellate court can overturn acquittals where the trial court's findings are perverse or unsustainable based on evidence, emphasizing the need for appropriate sentencing in cases of conspiracy and financial fraud.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 377(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120-B, 420, 419, 467, 468, 471, 511 - Criminal conspiracy and bank fraud - CBI sought to enhance the respondent's sentence for conspiracy and fraud involving forgery of demand drafts, leading to substantial financial loss. (Para 1)

(B) The trial court found the respondent guilty under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC but acquitted him under Sections 419, 467, 468, 471 r/w 511 IPC. The CBI argued this was due to a misapprehension of evidence. (Paras 4.1-4.2)

(C) The key issue was whether the acquittal and sentence were appropriate given the severity of the offenses and the respondent's role in a larger conspiracy. (Para 9.2)

(D) The court ultimately found the trial court's acquittal of the respondent unsustainable and set it aside, imposing a sentence of five years rigorous imprisonment for the conspiracy offenses along with financial penalties. (Paras 28-34) (E)

Result: Criminal appeal allowed; acquittal set aside; respondent convicted and sentenced to five years of rigorous imprisonment.

Table of Content
1. cbi appeals for enhanced sentence. (Para 1 , 2)
2. background of the offence and trial proceedings. (Para 3)
3. arguments for enhancing sentence and convicting under remaining charges. (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's analysis of facts and legal principles involved. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
5. examination of evidence presented and its validity. (Para 10)
6. discussion on conspiracy and evidence corroboration. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
7. detailed examination of witness testimonies and their significance. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
8. prosecution's ability to prove accusations beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 25)
9. decision on appeal based on established legal standards. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
10. court's decision to impose penalty and consider mitigating circumstances. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
11. concluding remarks on prison record provisions and health care. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)

JUDGMENT :

(K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.)

CBI filed this appeal under Section 377(2) of Cr.P.C. to allow the Criminal Appeal, (i) to enhance the sentence imposed on the Respondent/Accused-9 Asmath Kamal Choudry by the learned II Additional District and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Madurai, by virtue of judgment dated 26.05.2017 at par with the sentence imposed on other accused persons for the offences punishable u/sec.120-B r/w 420 IPC and (ii) to convict the Respondent/Accused-9 Asmath Kamal Choudry for the offences punishable u/sec.120-B r/w 419, 467, 468, 471 r/w 511 IPC and additional charges u/sec.120-B r/w 420, 419, 467, 468, 381, 471 r/w 511 IPC.

2. The respondent in Crl.A.(MD).No.406 of 2019 was originally arrayed as A9 in the C.C.No. 5 of 1998 on the file of the II Additional District Court for CBI Cases, Madurai.

3.Brief facts of the case:

He and others are said to have committed offences under section 120 (b) r/w. 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 of I.P.C. and 381 of I.P.C. and section 13 (2) r/w. 13 (1)(d) of P.C. Act 1988. The CBI registered the cases in R.C5,6 &8/S/94/CBI/SCB/MAS on 11.03.1994 on the strength of the source information alleging that the appellant and other persons had entered into conspiracy and stealthily removed two blank DD books each containing 100 leaves bearing numbers 008901 to 009000, one from bank of India, DN Road Branch Bombay and another D.D book containing 100 leaves bearing numbers 536901 to 537000 from to the Bank of Maharashtra, Ghatkoper East Branch, Bombay in the year 1992 and 1993. Thereafter they forged signature of the bank officials of Mumbai and fabricated four demand drafts of bank of india , bombay bearing Nos. 008925, 008927, 008928 and 008926 for the value of Rs.38,35,800/- and presented in the fictitious account opened by A1 in the name of Sri Murugan textile by giving fictitious address and impersonating himself as Ramesh as proprietor of the said textile in the Canara Bank, Ramnad Road Branch, Madurai with the active participation of A2 (Sub Staff with the Canara Bank) and A5 (Manager of the said branch). A1 presented the forged DDs on various dates and credited the amount in fictitious account and clandestinely withdrawn the said amount through two bearer cheques in the fictitious names of Ganesan and Venkatachalapathy with the active aid of A2 and A5 and further attempted to encash cvertain amount by presenting two forged DD bearing Nos.536901 and 7593 in the bank of Maharastra, which created suspicion and enquiry was made and the act of forgery was found out. Therefore, the said attempt was aborted. Thereafter, on receiving the source information, CBI registered various cases in R.C5,6 &8/S/94/CBI/SCB/MAS on 11.03.1994 and conducted the investigation and filed the common final report in the above three crime numbers against the appellant and other persons as stated below :-

A1.Raveendran,

A2.Balasubramanian,

A3. Nana Mahadev Jadav

A4. Prakash RAmachandra Payer

A5.Abdul Aziz

A6.Salim Siraj Gilani

A7.Ramasamy

A8.Muthukrishnan,

A9.Asmat Kamal Choudhry @ Hashmat Khan

3.1. The II Addi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top