IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
Punitha Arokiya Annai Thiruthala Peralaya Uzhiyar Munnetra Sangam – Appellant
Versus
Shrine Basilica of Our Lady Health Velankanni – Respondent
ORDER :
1. While W.P. No.20239/2013 was heard on 14.2.2025 and orders were reserved on the said date, however, W.P. Nos.17860 and 17861 of 2013 were listed for hearing on 21.2.2025 and since the larger issue therein was connected with the issue raised in W.P. No.20239/2013, though only a smaller relief was sought for in the said writ petitions, in view of the said larger question that falls for consideration, both the petitions are taken up together for final disposal through the present common order.
2. For the sake of convenience, the petitioner in W.P. No.20239/2013, which is the Union, shall be referred to as workmen and the petitioner in W.P. Nos.17860 and 17861/2013, who is the 1st respondent in W.P. No.20239/2013 shall be referred to as the Management.
3. W.M.P. Nos.17670 and 17672/2023, which have been filed by the petitioner in W.P. Nos.17860 and 17861/2013 to implead the legal heirs of the deceased respondents 12, 39, 53 and 57 are ordered as prayed for. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment to the cause title.
FACTS IN W.P. NO.20239/2013 :
4. It is the case of the petitioner that it is a Trade Union consisting of about 1000 employees, who are working under
Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa & Ors.
Coir Board, Ernakulam, Cochin & Ors. Vs. Indira Devi P.S. & Ors.
Venkateswara Rao v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha
Workmen Employed in Madras Pinjrapole Vs. Management of the Madras Pinjrapole
Som Prakash Rekhi v. Union of India
E. Gopal & Ors. Vs. Arulmigu Dhandayuthapaniswamy Temple & Ors.
The court found that religious institutions may qualify as 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, leading to labor law protections for workers disputing unpaid entitlements despite management ....
The definition of 'industry' under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 excludes organizations engaged in sovereign functions or those not producing goods or services for market consumpt....
A public charitable trust employing personnel for systematic management of properties and operational activities can be classified as an 'industry' under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, ....
The definition of 'Industry' includes entities engaging in systematic activities with employer-employee relations, irrespective of the profit motive, as determined under the Industrial Disputes Act.
The court affirmed that the Dharmarth Trust operates as an industry under the Industrial Disputes Act, acknowledging employee rights and obligations.
The determination of whether an entity qualifies as an 'industry' under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act should be based on the nature of its activities, and the power of reference under the Act is a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the management's activities met the criteria of an 'industry' under the I.D. Act, and the workman's termination was held to be illegal under S....
An employer performing non-sovereign functions must comply with the Industrial Disputes Act, including provisions for retrenchment, regardless of the employment's casual nature.
Cooperative housing societies are neither classified as 'industries' under the ID Act nor 'establishments' under the PG Act due to their focus on maintenance without systematic commercial activity.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.