IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J
N.Mani – Appellant
Versus
Registrar Pondicherry University – Respondent
ORDER :
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Certiorarified Mandamus seeking records of the order of the first respondent dated 18.12.2023 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to appoint the petitioner to the post of Professor, Centre for the Study of Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policy as per the Notification/Advertisement in Advt.No. PU/RC/2019/34, dated 05.08.2019. The petitioner claims that he is an eligible candidate and also seeks to give effect to the reservation policy.
2. In the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, it had been stated that the petitioner was serving as Associate Professor and Head of the Department of Economics at Erode Arts and Science College, a Government aided College at Erode. The first respondent had called for online applications on 05.08.2019 in advertisement No. PU/RC/2019/34 inviting applications from candidates, for the post of Professor under SC category in the Centre for Study of Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policy.
3. It had been contended specifically by the petitioner that since the inception of the said Centre in the year 2009, the post of Professor which had been reserved for SC
B.C.Mylarappa Vs. Dr.Chikkamylarappa & Others
The University of Mysore Vs. C. D. Govinda Rao and another
Union of India and Others Vs. Bikash Kuanar
Sadananda Halo and Others Vs. Momtaz Ali Sheikh and others
Madanlal and Others Vs. State of J & K and Others
Madras Institute of Development Studies and another Vs. K.Sivasubramaniyan and Others
Chirag Bhanu Singh and Other Vs. High Court of Himachal Pradesh and Others
Food Corporation of India Vs. Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries
Judicial review applies when selection processes lack transparency; rejection must be justified, especially when only one candidate is eligible. Arbitrary outcomes violate equal opportunity principle....
A candidate participating in a selection process cannot challenge it based on eligibility criteria if he does not succeed in the outcome.
Selection decisions must be justified and not arbitrary, ensuring fairness in administrative processes.
The court reaffirmed that participation in a selection process does not guarantee a right to appointment, emphasizing strict adherence to minimum qualifying marks as per applicable regulations and th....
The court upheld the appointment of Respondent No.4 as Professor, confirming compliance with UGC eligibility criteria and validating the selection process conducted by the university.
Employment and Service matter - Appointment as an Associate Professor in the School of Social Sciences of the Mahatma Gandhi University - Selection committee – Qualiification - Absence of post doctor....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the UGC Regulation, 2018, particularly regarding the eligibility criteria for the post of Associate Profes....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.