SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 126

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
V. Narasingh, J.
Satendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
Bail Application Nos. 7941, 7985, 11197 of 2022
Decided On : 01-02-2023

Advocates appeared:
S.D. Das, Advocate, M.M. Swain, Advocate, B.P. Pradhan, Advocate, K.K. Gaya, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of timely filing of the charge sheet and the legal import of the preliminary and final reports in the context of taking cognizance of the offense under the N.D.P.S. Act.

Headnote:

N.D.P.S. Act - Bail Application - Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/27-A/29 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 36-A(4) of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985, which stipulates the time limit for filing the charge sheet. It also referred to Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which outlines the submission of the police report to the Magistrate. The court emphasized the significance of the final report and the filing of the charge sheet within the prescribed period, highlighting the legal import of these documents in the context of taking cognizance of the offense.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was accused of offenses under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/27-A/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act for carrying contraband. The petitioner sought bail on the grounds of the alleged illegal custody due to the delayed filing of the charge sheet.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the submission of the preliminary charge sheet within the stipulated period and the subsequent filing of the final charge sheet were in compliance with the relevant provisions. It concluded that there was no infringement of the petitioner's indefeasible right to warrant his release on 'default bail'.

Issues: The main issue revolved around the legality of the custody due to the timing of the charge sheet filings and the interpretation of the provisions of the N.D.P.S. Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of the timely submission of the charge sheet and the legal significance of the preliminary and final reports in the context of taking cognizance of the offense. It held that there was no violation of the petitioner's indefeasible right, as the charge sheet was filed within the prescribed period.

Final Decision: The bail applications were rejected, and the court disposed of the cases without costs.

JUDGMENT

V. Narasingh, J. - Since all the three BLAPLs arise out of the same P.S. Case (Chandrapur P.S. Case No.17 of 2020) (T.R. No.05/2022 on the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Gunupur), they were heard together on the consent of the parties and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Heard Mr. S.D. Das, learned senior counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. K.K. Gaya, learned Addl. Standing Counsel.

3. The petitioner (Satendra Kumar) is an accused in connection with T.R. No.05 of 2020, pending in the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Gunupur, for alleged commission of offences under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/27-A/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

4. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Gunupur, by order dated 22.07.2022 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

5. The undisputed facts are that the petitioner along with his two other co-accused namely, Raju Mehetwa @ Mahato (BLAPL No.7985 of 2022) and Anil Kumar Pandit (BLAPL No.11197 of 2022) were taken into custody on 27.05.2020 for alleged commission of offences under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/27-A/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985 for carrying contraband (Ganja) to the tune of 245Kgs.

6. On 22.11.2020, the Investigating officer submitted the charge-sheet, styling the same as 'preliminary charge-sheet' on the 179 th day, keeping the investigation open under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Code).

7. The order passed by the learned Special Judge on 22.11.2020 is culled out hereunder:-

    T.R.-5/2020

    'The case record is put up today as the I.O. of this case is submitted the Preliminary Charge Sheet no.29, Dtd. 22.11.2020 u/S 20(b)(ii)(C) of N.D.P.S. Act against the accused persons namely 1. Anil Kumar Pandit, S/O- Late Jagadish Pandit of Village- Near Pratapnagar Sabeli, P.S- Nandangari, Madoli-93, North-East Delhi, 2. Satendra Kumar, S/O- Sriram Pritsa of Village- Srirampur, P.S- Bella, Dist-Sitamani (Bihar) and 3. Raju Mehetwa, S/O-Sukan Mehetwa of Village-Kharrabisampur, P.S-Behla, Dist- Korihari (Bihar) and has kept the investigation open as per 173(8) of Cr.P.C for arrest of the other two accused persons namely Duli Bibar and Abhiram Bibar. He also submitted sixteen sheets of Case Diary, eleven sheets of statement u/S. 161 Cr.P.C, two sheets of Spot Map, four sheets of Seizure list, two sheets of Zimanama and other connecting documents (in total 60 sheets). Tag the same in the case record.

    Perused the preliminary charge sheet & other connecting papers and found that there is a prima facie material against the accused persons namely. 1. Anil Kumar Pandit, 2. Satendra Kumar and 3. Raju Mehetwa for commission of offence u/S 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act. Hence, cognizance of the offence u/S 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act is taken against the above named accused persons.

    Put up on date fixed for submission of Final Charge sheet and further order.'

8. On 11.08.2021, the Investigating Officer submitted the 'final charge-sheet' and the order passed is quoted hereunder:-

    T.R.05/2020

    'The record is put up today as the I.O. of this case is submitted Final Charge Sheet vide C.S.19 dated 31.07.2021 for the offence u/S- 20(b)(ii)(C)/27-A/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, against accused person namely

    1. Anil Kumar Pandit, aged about- 43 years, S/o-Late Jagadish Pandit of Village- Near Pratap nagar Sabeli, PS: Nandangiri, Madoli-93, North east Delhi,

    2. Satendra Kumar, aged about 27 years S/O-Sriram Krishna vill: Srirampur, Ps- Bella, Dist-Saltamani (Bihar), 3. Raju Mehetwa, aged about 19 years S/O: Sukan Mahetwa, Vill: Kharrabisampur, PS: Behla, Dist- Korihari (Bihar) 4. Duli Bibara aged about 56 years, S/O: Late Mani Bibara of Vill Gerengaguda PS: Chandrapur Dist: Rayagada 5. Abhiram Bibara, aged about 31 years, S/O: Duli Bibara, Vill: Gerengaguda, PS: Chandrapur, Dist: Rayagada showing accused person namely Abhiram Bibar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top