Nakul Kharsel @ Nirmal vs State of Odisha

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Ori) 5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K.Pattanaik
Nakul Kharsel @ Nirmal – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. G. Sahu, Advocate
For the Opposite Party : Mr. D.R. Mohapatra, AGA

Table of Content
1. petitioner's modification request (Para 1 , 2)
2. contention on bail payment conditions (Para 3 , 4)
3. court observes conditions on bail (Para 5)
4. order to dispense bail conditions (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

ORDER :

R.K. Pattanaik, J.

1. Heard Mr. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohapatra, learned AGA for the State.

2. Instant petition is filed by the petitioner seeking modification of the Court’s order dated 11^th March, 2025 followed by the order in I.A. No.836 of 2025 dated 8^th August, 2025 arising out of BLAPL No. 1700 of 2025 on the grounds stated therein.

3. It is submitted to the Court by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner since was inclined to deposit an amount of Rs.1 lac instead of Rs.4.8 lac, the order in I.A. No.836 of 2025 was obtained. The further submission is that the petitioner has already deposited Rs.4.8 lac and hence, with an erroneous submission, the I.A. was disposed of by order dated 8^th August, 2025. It is pleaded that the petitioner is unable to arrange the balance amount besides the payment of Rs.4.8 lac and he is in custody till date despite an order in BLAPL No. 1700 of 2025 dated 11^th March, 2025, hence, the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document