SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 67

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.
Suryanarayan Mishra - Petitioner
Versus
State of Odisha & Others - Opposite Parties
W.P.(C) Nos.27952 of 2025, 27978 of 2025, 27979 of 2025, 28148 of 2025, 28510 of 2025, 28519 of 2025, 28527 of 2025, 28528 of 2025, 28538 of 2025, 29454 of 2025, 29504 of 2025, 29663 of 2025, 29744 of 2025, 29953 of 2025, 29956 of 2025, 30614 of 2025, 31005 of 2025 of  32846 of 2025, 33204 of 2025, 33528 of 2025, 34052 of 2025,   34122 of 2025, 31423 of 2025, 34125 of 20258 & 34128 of 2025
Decided On : 02-02-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. B.Senapati, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. S.N. Patnaik, A.G.A.

The court upheld that the current Writ Petitions are governed by the earlier judgment, establishing precedence in similar matters.

Headnote:(A) Writ Petitions - The issues in these Writ Petitions are covered by the ratio of a judgment in Dr. Dhirendra Nath Sarangi vs. State of Odisha (W.P.

(C). No. 26188 of 2025). (Para 3)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner filed Writ Petitions concerning issues already resolved in a related judgment.

Findings of Court:
The Writ Petitions are disposed of in accordance with the referenced judgment.

Issues: The central issue was whether the matters in the Writ Petitions were similar to those determined in the cited case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the previously rendered judgment provided the necessary guidance for the resolution of the current Writ Petitions.

Result: Writ Petitions disposed of.

Table of Content
1. introduction of hybrid hearing process. (Para 1)
2. legal representation acknowledges common issues. (Para 2)
3. case covered by precedent judgment. (Para 3)
4. writ petitions disposed based on prior judgment. (Para 4)

ORDER :

SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. It is agreed by the learned counsel for the parties that the issues involved in these Writ Petitions are covered by the ratio of the judgment passed today in the case of Dr. Dhirendra Nath Sarangi vs. State of Odisha (W.P.(C). No. 26188 of 2025).

4. In view of the reasons stated in the detailed judgment citied above, these Writ Petitions are accordingly, disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top