Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Suryanarayan Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of hybrid hearing process. (Para 1) |
| 2. legal representation acknowledges common issues. (Para 2) |
| 3. case covered by precedent judgment. (Para 3) |
| 4. writ petitions disposed based on prior judgment. (Para 4) |
ORDER :
SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. It is agreed by the learned counsel for the parties that the issues involved in these Writ Petitions are covered by the ratio of the judgment passed today in the case of Dr. Dhirendra Nath Sarangi vs. State of Odisha (W.P.(C). No. 26188 of 2025).
4. In view of the reasons stated in the detailed judgment citied above, these Writ Petitions are accordingly, disposed of.
The court upheld that the current Writ Petitions are governed by the earlier judgment, establishing precedence in similar matters.
The court affirms the right to seek judicial intervention in matters involving banking institutions and administrative grievances.
Judicial consistency mandates that analogous cases be decided similarly to uphold legal principles and avoid conflicting judgments.
The court issued an order in response to the Writ Petition.
The principle of adhering to established judicial precedents in the interest of consistency and fairness in legal proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
