Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI
Dhiren Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's employment and grant-in-aid suspension. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations against the petitioner and communications. (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioner's counsel challenges the illegality of actions. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's consideration and hearing processes. (Para 5) |
| 5. questions for legal determination by the court. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. statutory provisions concerning grant-in-aid. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 7. interpretation of legislative intention regarding institutions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 8. competency and disciplinary authority in educational institutions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 9. legal principles on statutory interpretation. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 10. jurisdiction and exercise of statutory powers. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 11. interpretations regarding statutory powers and requirements. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 12. findings on the allegations and procedural fairness. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 13. natural justice principles in administrative actions. (Para 36 , 37) |
| 14. court's decision to quash proceedings and order restitution. (Para 38 , 39) |
| 15. writ petition outcomes and conclusion. (Para 40) |
Judgment :
The petitioner, who was working as a Reader in S.V.M. Autonomous College,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
