SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 640

ORISSA HIGH COURT
NILENDRI CHARAN SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.

1. Since the issues raised in all the Writ Petitions referred to above involve common questions of fact and law, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of convenience and effective adjudication, W.P.(C) No.26766 of 2025 is treated as the lead case.

2. In W.P.(C) No.26766 of 2025, the Petitioner challenges the action of the Opposite Party No.2/ State Transport Authority (STA), Odisha, Cuttack in not transmitting the VCRs against the Vehicle No.OD-04-R-2027 to the court of the learned J.M.F.C. (Transport), Cuttack to dispose of the same as per law and keeping in view the judgment of this Court in Anjana Babulal Darabadvrs.- Commissioner, STA and Ors., 2014 SCC Online Ori 652

I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE

1. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

(i) The Petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle bearing registration No.OD-04-R-2027 and sustaining his livelihood by plying the said vehicle. While the vehicle was plying on road, the V.C.Rs bearing ChallanN0.0R7148472231120013452 dated 18.11.2023 and bearing ChallanN0.0R7148472231207034769 dated 05.12.2023 are illegally issued against the Ve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top