IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, JJ.
Hardam Singh — Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab — Respondent
Criminal Appeal (D) No. 109, 146, 298 of 2014
Decided on : 12-09-2019
JUDGMENT :
Rajiv Sharma, J.
Since common questions of law and facts are involved in CRAD-109-DB of 2014, CRA-D-146-DB of 2014 and CRA-D-298-DB of 2014, therefore, these are taken up together and being disposed of by a common judgment.
2. These appeals are instituted against judgment dated 23.12.2013 and order dated 24.12.2013, rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, in Sessions Case No. 54 of 14.05.2003. Appellants Hardam Singh, Piara Singh, Narinder Pal Singh and Harcharan Singh along with co-accused Gurcharan Singh, Ramesh Singh, Joginder Singh, Tarlok Singh, Gurmukh Singh, Shankar Lal Sharma, Swaran Singh, Baljinder Singh alias Balwinder Singh, Major Singh, Ramji Lal and Thana Singh were charged with and tried for the offences punishable under Sections 148/302/307 read with Section 149 IPC. Appellants Narinder Pal Singh, Harcharan Singh along with co-accused Gurcharan Singh and Ramesh Singh were also charged with and tried for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The appellants were convicted and sentenced as under :-
| Name of the appellant | Convicted under Section | Sentenced to | In default of payment of fine |
| Hardam Singh, Piara Singh, Narinder Pal Singh and Harcharan | Singh 148 IPC | Rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/-. | Rigorous imprisonment for six months |
| Hardam Singh, Piara Singh, Narinder Pal Singh and Harcharan Singh | 302/149 IPC | Rigorous imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 25,000/-. | Rigorous imprisonment for one year. |
| Hardam Singh, Piara Singh, Narinder Pal Singh and Harcharan Singh | 307/149 IPC | Rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs. 15,000/-. | Rigorous imprisonment for ten months |
| Narinder Pal Singh | 27 of Arms Act | Rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs. 5,000/-. | Rigorous imprisonment for four months. |
| Harcharan Singh | 27 of Arms Act | Rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs. 5,000/-. | Rigorous imprisonment for four months. |
All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
3. Co-Accused Gurcharan Singh, Ramesh Singh, Gurmukh Singh, Shankar Lal Sharma, Swaran Singh, Joginder Singh Constable, Baljinder Singh alias Balwinder Singh, Major Singh, Ramji Lal and Thana Singh were acquitted of the charges framed against them. Co-accused Joginder Singh retired Sub Inspector and Tarlok Singh died during the pendency of trial, therefore, criminal proceedings against them were abated. Co-accused Kala Singh was declared proclaimed offender.
4. Narinder Pal Singh - appellant No.1 in CRA-D-298-DB of 2014 died during pendency of the appeal on 27.11.2017. Hence, appeal qua him stands abated.
5. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is that earlier, FIR No. 179 was registered on 25.10.1991 at Police Station City Abohar. It was registered on the basis of statement made by ASI Narinder Pal Singh. According to the prosecution case, workers of Bhawani Cotton Mill situated in City Abohar had gone on strike. The Mill management, in order to resolve the issue, sought interference of the police. On 25.10.1991, ASI Narinder Pal Singh reached in the premises of the Mill. He tried to persuade the labourers/workers. Ram Avtar, Uttam Chand and Bangali Babu, being members of INTUC, used to interfere at the time of negotiations. They were not employees of the Mill. The Mill workers were holding dharna. The police party resorted to firing from their respective weapons. Six persons were killed at the spot. Two persons succumbed to injuries in the hospital. Eighteen persons were injured.
6. Ram Avtar and another had filed Criminal Miscellaneous No. 9179-M of 1996 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking direction for registration of first information report against re
Arvinder Singh Bagga v. State of U. P.
Amrik Singh v. The State of Pepsu
Abdul Wahab Ansari Vs. State of Bihar and another
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India
Barrett v. Enfield London Borough Council
Bodhisattwa Gautam v. Ms. Subhra Chakraborty
Bhim Singh v. State of J. & K.
Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
B. Saha and Ors. v. M. S. Kochar
Babulal Parate v. State of Maharashtra
Bhagwan Prasad Srivastava Vs. N.P. Mishra
Chairman, Railway Board and others Vs. Chandrima Das (Mrs) and others
Choudhury Parveen Sultana Vs. State of West Bengal and another
Deputy Commissioner, Dharwad District, Dharwad and others Vs. Shivakka (2) and others
Dr. Satyanarayana Sinha v. S. Lal and Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Derbyshire County Council v. Times Newspapers Ltd.
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal
D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal
Dagdu and others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Gauri Shanker Sharma Vs. State of U.P.
Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council, (2004) 1 WLR 1057
Gauri Shankar Prasad vs. State of Bihar
Himat Lal K. Shah Vs. Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad and another
Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, (1989) AC 53
HL and X v Bedfordshire County Council
Hanuman Singh and others Vs. State
Inder Singh v. State of Punjab
In Re: Death of Sawinder Singh Grower
J. H. Rayner Ltd. v. Dept. of Trade
K.H. Shekarappa and others Vs. State of Karnatka
Kewal Pati (Smt) Vs. State of U.P. and others
Kishor Singh Ravinder Dev etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan
M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Munshi Singh Gautam (Dead) and others Vs. State of M.P.
Murti Devi Vs. State of Delhi and others
Nilabati Behera alias Lalita Behera v. State of Orissa
Punjab & Haryana High Court Bar Association Vs. state of Punjab and others, (1996) 4 SCC 742
Phelps v. Hillingdon London Borough Council
Prithipal Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another
Pratul Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Bihar and another
Peoples Union for Civil Liberties Vs. Union of India and another
P.K. Pradhan Vs. State of Sikkim
Peoples Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India
P.P. Unnikrishnan and another Vs. Puttiyottil Alikutty and another
Prakash Kadam and others Vs. Ramprasad Vishwanath Gupta and another
Peoples Union for Democratic Rights v. State of Bihar
Peoples Union for Democratic Rights V. State of Bihar
Raj Kumar Vs. Ajay Kumar and another
Railway Board, v. Chandrima Das
R.D. Upadhyay Vs. State of A.P. and others
Rubabbuddin Sheikh Vs. State of Gujrat and others
Realm of Public Interest Litigation. In Bangalore Medical Trust v. B. S. Muddappa
Ramlila Maidan Incident, In Re
Raghubir Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Smt. Selvi & Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka
Sham Kant Vs. State of Maharashtra
State of M.P. Vs. Shyamsunder Trivedi and others
Smt. Shakila Abdul Gafar Khan Vs. Vasant Raghunath Dhoble and another
Sebastian M. Homgray v Union of India
Saheli, A Womens Resources Centre v. Commr. of Police, Delhi Police Headquarters
Sebastian M. Homgray v Union of India
State of Maharashtra v. Ravikant S. Patil
Saheli v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi
Saheli, A Womens Resources Centre v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi
State of U.P. Vs. Paras Nath Singh
State of West Bengal v. Mir Mohammad Omar
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Students Parent Medical College, Shimla
Shambhu Nath Mehra v. The State of Ajmer
Sucha Singh v. State of Punjab
State of Haryana Vs. Bhagirath and others
Yadava Kumar Vs. Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Limited and another
gpt-4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.