ANOOP CHITKARA
Sukhvir Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
85 | 25.05.2022 | Adampur, District Jalandhar | 307, 506, 427, 120-, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 |
1. The petitioners apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above have come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 11 of the bail application, the accused declares that there are no cases against the second petitioner, however, the first petitioner has the following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. | FIR No. | Date | Offences | Police Station |
1 | 162 | 08.07.2017 | 15 of NDPS Act | - |
2. | 56 | 29.03.2006 | 15/61/85 NDPA | - |
3. | 116 | 15.07.2018 | 15 of NDPS Act | Maqsudan District Jalandhar (Rural) |
3. The complainant alleged that the Gurmeet Singh, husband of first petitioner and father of the second petitioner hired professional killers to kill him because he had put mud on a land which the accused party claimed to own. The assailants allegedly fired upon the complainant but he was saved.
4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners contends that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioners and family.
5. While opposi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.